Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36124354›Full record

SynthesisDermatologic therapy2022

Short-term efficacy and safety of total skin electron beam therapy in mycosis fungoides: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vieri Grandi, Gabriele Simontacchi, Tommaso Grassi, Alessandro Pileri, Nicola Pimpinelli

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dermatologic therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Total skin electron beam therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vieri GrandiDermatology Unit, Department of Human Health Sciences, University of Florence, P. Palagi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Gabriele SimontacchiRadiotherapy Unit AOU Careggi, Careggi Universitary Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Tommaso GrassiPublic Health, Hygiene and Preventive Medicine Unit, P. Palagi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Alessandro PileriDermatology Unit, Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Nicola PimpinelliDermatology Unit, Department of Human Health Sciences, University of Florence, P. Palagi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITSanta Maria Nuova Hospital · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is one of the mainstays of treatment for mycosis fungoides. The most common modalities are standard dose (30-36 Gy) and low dose (10-12 Gy). To review the literature on the efficacy and safety profiles of standard dose and low dose TSEBT. We searched electronic databases for studies that enrolled patients with Mycosis Fungoides and treated with TSEBT. We estimated the event rates associated with low dose and standard dose TSEBT. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline was followed. Main outcomes were complete response rate, partial response rate, mild and severe adverse events rate low dose TSEBT had a Complete Response Rate of 28% [0.19, 0.37], an Overall Response Rate of 85% [0.76, 0.93], a mild adverse events rate of 93% [0.82, 1.04] and a severe adverse events rate of 5% [-0.04; 0.14] Standard dose TSEBT had a Complete Response Rate of 57% [0.41; 0.73], the Overall Response Rate was 99% [0.97; 1.02], the mild adverse events rate was 100%, the severe adverse events rate was 7% [-0.01; 0.16]. Comparing standard dose TSEBT in the early versus advanced stages, advanced stages patients had a Risk Ratio = 0.77 in obtaining a Complete Response [0.64, 0.92](p = 0.0158). TSEBT is an associated with an excellent short term safety profile. Both schedules show high ORR, with standard dose TSEBT demonstrating highest CRR. Advanced stage of disease negatively influence the CRR.

Indexed as

Mycosis FungoidesSkin NeoplasmsElectronsHumansRemission Inductionmeta-analysismycosis fungoidestotal skin electron beam therapy

Identifiers

PMID36124354
PMCPMC9786352
OpenAlexW4296705534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.