Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36124286›Full record

GuidelineCanadian respiratory journal2022

Guidance for Administering Biologics for Severe Asthma and Allergic Conditions.

Delbert R Dorscheid, Jason K Lee, Warren Ramesh, Mark Greenwald, Jaime Del Carpio

Open access · goldAbstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Canadian respiratory journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A survey of severe asthma in Canada: results from the CASCADE practice reflective program.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Delbert R DorscheidDivision of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, Center for Heart Lung Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0680-0258
Jason K LeeClinical Immunology & Allergy Internal Medicine, Evidence Based Medical Educator Inc. & Urticaria Canada, Biologics and Therapeutics Committee, ACAAI, Toronto M5G 1E2 ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7535-6584
Warren RameshRoyal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton Respiratory Consultants, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3S9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0877-808X
Mark GreenwaldUniversity of Toronto and Queen's University, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9468-7461
Jaime Del CarpioDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, McGill University, Montreal H3A 0G4, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8471-9263
McGill University · CARoyal Alexandra Hospital · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asthma is a common respiratory disorder in Canada for which biologics may be prescribed for poorly controlled illness. Treatment with biologics, however, is sometimes inappropriately discontinued due to misconceptions regarding their potential immunologic effects, and concerns surrounding their continued use in severe asthma during the COVID-19 pandemic continue to propagate. Biologics can still be administered in a majority of health and treatment conditions. With regard to cardiac-related issues such as hypertension or cardiovascular disease (CVD), there is no solid evidence that suggests biologics should be withheld, as the benefits of treatment outweigh the risks. Asthmatic patients on biologic treatment should also continue treatment if they have, or are currently being treated for, a respiratory infection, including COVID-19. Evidence also indicates the importance of maintaining asthma control to reduce the risk of severe COVID-19 infection. Biologic treatment can be administered in severe asthmatic patients with bronchiectasis, though further evidence is needed to better understand the benefits. Biologic treatment should be continued postsurgery to reduce postoperative respiratory complications, as well as throughout the course of pregnancy. Regarding concerns over vaccine administration, nearly all vaccines can be given without interruption of biologic treatment in patients with severe asthma or allergic conditions. Appropriate screening for respiratory illnesses, such as COVID-19, continues to be warranted in clinical practices to reduce the risk of transmission. As recommendations from public health and regulatory agencies have been lacking, this guidance document addresses the administration of biologics in different health circumstances and respiratory illness screening during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

AsthmaBiological ProductsCOVID-19FemaleHumansMalePandemicsPregnancyPublic HealthBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID36124286
PMCPMC9482537
OpenAlexW4295110284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.