Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36124283›Full record

ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2022

Folliculotropic Mycosis Fungoides: Current Guidance and Experience from Clinical Practice.

Gabriele Roccuzzo, Luca Mastorino, Giuseppe Gallo, Paolo Fava, Simone Ribero, Pietro Quaglino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriele Roccuzzo *Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Luca Mastorino *Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Giuseppe GalloDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8390-4467
Paolo FavaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Simone RiberoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Pietro QuaglinoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Folliculotropic mycosis fungoides (FMF) is the most frequent variant of mycosis fungoides (MF), with clinical features which differ from the classic form. As for therapeutic options, the latest guidelines on MF agree on a stage-driven strategy, in consideration of clinical presentation, symptom burden and patient's comorbidities. Materials and Methods: A search on MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library was conducted to gather the latest evidence on FMF clinical management. Manuscripts published in the last five years (January 2017-April 2022) were included. Our single-center experience was also described. Results: A total of 15 articles were analyzed, with a total of 432 patients (disease stage from IA to IVA2). The most widely-used treatment was psoralen ultra-violet A (PUVA) in monotherapy or in association with other drugs. Oral retinoid-based therapy was also described as a therapeutic option alone or in combination. Other therapy reported were based on Brentuximab Vedotin, Mogamulizumab, Carmustine, topical steroids, tazarotene and excimer laser, interferon, nitrogen mustard, imiquimod, systemic chemotherapy, extracorporeal photopheresis and stem cell transplantation. Discussion: FMF is characterized by specific clinical-pathologic features. Advanced forms assume characteristics more similar to classic MF (infiltrated plaques and nodules), whilst early stages can present in a wide range of clinical forms (acneiform lesions, follicular-like keratoses, erythematous patches). As for therapeutic options, in absence of specific guidelines, a high number of treatments are described in clinical practice, with variable results. Phototherapy in all its forms, especially as PUVA, appears to have the greatest initial therapeutic success. Retinoids, although widely used, appear to be poorly effective in monotherapy, particularly acitretin. Combination treatment with phototherapy seems to be advisable. Ionizing treatments, such as radiotherapy and TSEBT, appear effective, at least in the short term. Overall, an integrated approach is mandatory for the inconstant course of the disease and its multidisciplinary nature.

Indexed as

cutaneous lymphomafolliculotropic mycosis fungoidesmycosis fungoidesprimary cutaneous T-cell lymphomatherapy

Identifiers

PMID36124283
PMCPMC9482435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.