ReviewBiophysical reviews2022
Machine learning methods for assessing photosynthetic activity: environmental monitoring applications.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combine photosynthetic characteristics and leaf hyperspectral reflectance for early detection of water stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- High-Resolution Frequency-Domain Spectroscopic and Modeling Studies of Photosystem I (PSI), PSI Mutants and PSI Supercomplexes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Editorial for the special issue of biophysical reviews on the 9th Congress of the Russian society for photobiology held in Shepsi, Krasnodar region, Russia, on September 12-19, 2021.Biophysical reviews · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring of the photosynthetic activity of natural and artificial biocenoses is of crucial importance. Photosynthesis is the basis for the existence of life on Earth, and a decrease in primary photosynthetic production due to anthropogenic influences can have catastrophic consequences. Currently, great efforts are being made to create technologies that allow continuous monitoring of the state of the photosynthetic apparatus of terrestrial plants and microalgae. There are several sources of information suitable for assessing photosynthetic activity, including gas exchange and optical (reflectance and fluorescence) measurements. The advent of inexpensive optical sensors makes it possible to collect data locally (manually or using autonomous sea and land stations) and globally (using aircraft and satellite imaging). In this review, we consider machine learning methods proposed for determining the functional parameters of photosynthesis based on local and remote optical measurements (hyperspectral imaging, solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence, local chlorophyll fluorescence imaging, and various techniques of fast and delayed chlorophyll fluorescence induction). These include classical and novel (such as Partial Least Squares) regression methods, unsupervised cluster analysis techniques, various classification methods (support vector machine, random forest, etc.) and artificial neural networks (multilayer perceptron, long short-term memory, etc.). Special aspects of time-series analysis are considered. Applicability of particular information sources and mathematical methods for assessment of water quality and prediction of algal blooms, for estimation of primary productivity of biocenoses, stress tolerance of agricultural plants, etc. is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.