ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
A novel chest CT severity score in COVID-19 and its correlation with severity and prognosis of the lung disease: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between ADA (Age-D-dimer-Albumin) Score and Chest CT Severity Score in COVID-19 Pneumonia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic Implications of Initial Radiological Findings of Pulmonary Fibrosis in Patients with Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Prospective Multicentric Study.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Identifying severe community-acquired pneumonia using radiomics and clinical data: a machine learning approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Hyaluronic Acid is Associated with Severity and Prognosis in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- A Systematic Review of the Relationship between Chest CT Severity Score and Laboratory Findings and Clinical Parameters in COVID-19 Pneumonia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: HRCT chest has a high sensitivity in the diagnosis of patients with COVID-19 infection. Through our study, we intend to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader variability of a semi-quantitative CT severity score, a novel parameter designed for risk stratification and prognostication of COVID-19 pneumonia with clinical staging of disease. Methods: It was a single-center retrospective analysis performed on an original cohort of 4180 symptomatic patients with the suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 interstitial pneumonia. Out of 4180, a total of 4004 patients with COVID-19 were confirmed by an RT-PCR. We used an HRCT chest severity score (CT-SS) to evaluate the COVID-19 disease burden on the initial scan obtained at admission. The data were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics Version 22.0 Release 2013. Results: Our study subjects demonstrated the most common clinical features fever, cough, dyspnea, and body aches. Raised CRP levels (CRP >0.5 mg/dL) were found in 81.86% and increased D-dimer levels (>500 ng/mL) were found in 92.3% of patients. The most common radiological findings of the disease included ground-glass opacities, observed in 98.8%. Our study has a sensitivity of 89.2%, a specificity of 94.8%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90.6%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94%. Conclusion: As per our findings, this novel CT scoring system might aid in the risk stratification and the short-term prognostication of patients suffering from COVID-19 pneumonia. This will eventually help in curtailing the extensive burden on the healthcare system amid the current pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.