Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36124122›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Region Convolutional Neural Network for Brain Tumor Segmentation.

R Pitchai, K Praveena, P Murugeswari, Ashok Kumar, M K Mariam Bee, Nouf M Alyami, R S Sundaram, B Srinivas, Lavanya Vadda, T Prince

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

R PitchaiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, B V Raju Institute of Technology, Narsapur 502313, Telangana, India.
K PraveenaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh 517102, India.
P MurugeswariDepartment of Computer Science Engineering (Cyber Security), Karpagam College of Engineering, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.
Ashok KumarDepartment of Computer Science, Banasthali Vidyapith, Aliyabad 304022, Rajasthan, India.
M K Mariam BeeDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 602105, Tamil Nadu, India.
Nouf M AlyamiDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
R S SundaramDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.
B SrinivasDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Maharaj Vijayaram Gajapathi Raj College of Engineering (A), Vizianagaram 535005, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Lavanya VaddaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Maharaj Vijayaram Gajapathi Raj College of Engineering (A), Vizianagaram 535005, Andhra Pradesh, India.
T PrinceDepartment of Computer Science, Woldia Institute of Technology, Woldia University, North Wollo, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8245-2710

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliomas are often difficult to find and distinguish using typical manual segmentation approaches because of their vast range of changes in size, shape, and appearance. Furthermore, the manual annotation of cancer tissue segmentation under the close supervision of a human professional is both time-consuming and exhausting to perform. It will be easier and faster in the future to get accurate and quick diagnoses and treatments thanks to automated segmentation and survival rate prediction models that can be used now. In this article, a segmentation model is designed using RCNN that enables automatic prognosis on brain tumors using MRI. The study adopts a U-Net encoder for capturing the features during the training of the model. The feature extraction extracts geometric features for the estimation of tumor size. It is seen that the shape, location, and size of a tumor are significant factors in the estimation of prognosis. The experimental methods are conducted to test the efficacy of the model, and the results of the simulation show that the proposed method achieves a reduced error rate with increased accuracy than other methods.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID36124122
PMCPMC9482475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.