Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36124079›Full record

ArticleRehabilitation research and practice2022

Healthcare Professionals' Experiences with Rehabilitation Practices for Patients with Cognitive Impairment after Stroke in North Norway: A Qualitative Study.

Anniken Bogstrand, Astrid Gramstad, Audny Anke, Henriette Holm Stabel, Cathrine Arntzen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rehabilitation research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A scoping review of patient and public involvement in empirical stroke research.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anniken BogstrandDepartment of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-8408
Astrid GramstadDepartment of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2301-5067
Audny AnkeDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, 9038 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2491-2560
Henriette Holm StabelHammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research Clinic, University of Aarhus, Voldbyvej 15, DK-8450 Hammel, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3531-2536
Cathrine ArntzenCentre for Care Research, North, Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8194-0437

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods: A focus group interview with clinicians, coordinators, and leaders involved in stroke survivors' rehabilitation trajectories was conducted. The group consisted of a strategic selection of participants with diverse professional backgrounds from specialist and primary healthcare services. The transcribed material was analyzed thematically using systematic text condensation based on an inductive, interpretive approach. Results: We found that patients with mild and moderate cognitive impairment after stroke were characterized as a neglected group in rehabilitation services and that neglect was related to both structural and professional issues. First, neglect seemed partly related to the availability of existing healthcare services, which mainly followed up on physical challenges after stroke. Second, cognitive rehabilitation seemed to be less prioritized than other health services, and the established interdisciplinary municipality teams did not seem prepared to follow-up on cognitive issues. Finally, at a professional level, the study reveals the need for building competence in cognitive rehabilitation and having services available in the long run. Conclusion: The study demonstrates the need to increase knowledge concerning cognitive rehabilitation and how rehabilitation trajectories and services should be organized to fulfil stroke survivors' and carers' long-term needs.

Identifiers

PMID36124079
PMCPMC9482544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.