Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36123983›Full record

ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2022

Understanding and Measuring the Cognitive Load of Amputees for Rehabilitation and Prosthesis Development.

Robin Rackerby, Stephan Lukosch, Deborah Munro

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. User-Centered Design of Neuroprosthetics: Advancements and Limitations.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Applications and Future Translation of Somatosensory Neuroprostheses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Evaluating the partial contribution of the P3 event-related potential elicited by auditory oddball stimuli during the Stroop task.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robin RackerbyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Stephan LukoschHIT Lab New Zealand, School of Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Deborah MunroDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
University of Canterbury · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To derive a definition of cognitive load that is applicable for amputation as well as analyze suitable research models for measuring cognitive load during prosthesis use. Defining cognitive load for amputation will improve rehabilitation methods and enable better prosthesis design. Data Sources: Elsevier, Springer, PLoS, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed. Study Selection: Studies on upper limb myoelectric prostheses and neuroprostheses were prioritized. For understanding measurement, lower limb amputations and studies with individuals without lower limb amputations were included. Data Extraction: Queries including "cognitive load," "neural fatigue," "brain plasticity," "neuroprosthetics," "upper limb prosthetics," and "amputation" were used with peer-reviewed journals or articles. Articles published within the last 6 years were prioritized. Articles on foundational principles were included regardless of date. A total of 69 articles were found: 12 on amputation, 15 on cognitive load, 8 on phantom limb, 22 on sensory feedback, and 12 on measurement methods. Data Synthesis: The emotional, physiological, and neurologic aspects of amputation, prosthesis use, and rehabilitation aspects of cognitive load were analyzed in conjunction with measurement methods, including resolution, invasiveness, and sensitivity to user movement and environmental noise. Conclusions: Use of "cognitive load" remains consistent with its original definition. For amputation, 2 additional elements are needed: "emotional fatigue," defined as an amputee's emotional response, including mental concentration and emotions, and "neural fatigue," defined as the physiological and neurologic effects of amputation on brain plasticity. Cognitive load is estimated via neuroimaging techniques, including electroencephalography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Because fNIRS measures cognitive load directly, has good temporal and spatial resolution, and is not as restricted by user movement, fNIRS is recommended for most cognitive load studies.

Indexed as

CLT, Cognitive Load TheoryERP, event-related potentialfMRI, functional magnetic resonance imagingfNIRS, functional near-infrared spectroscopyNeurological rehabilitationRehabilitationTBI, traumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID36123983
PMCPMC9482031
OpenAlexW4285400621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.