Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36123976›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2022

A Prospective Assessment of an Adjustable, Immediate Fit, Subischial Transfemoral Prosthesis.

Timothy R Dillingham, Jessica L Kenia, Frances S Shofer, James S Marschalek

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02886936 (Immediate Fit Using Innovative Technology Transtibial & Transfemoral Prosthesis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02886936 nacompletednot on this map

Immediate Fit Using Innovative Technology Transtibial & Transfemoral Prosthesis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2018 to 2022Enrolled71ConditionsAmputationArmsiFIT Transtibial Prosthesis, iFIT Transfemoral Prosthesis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Timothy R DillinghamDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Jessica L KeniaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Frances S ShoferDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
James S MarschalekAdvanced Design Concepts, Pewaukee, WI.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of an adjustable, subischial transfemoral prosthesis by comparing self-reported outcome measures regarding socket comfort, fit and utility relative to a persons' conventionally made socket. Assessing limb compressibility was another aim of this study. Design: A single-group pre-post intervention design. Setting: Physical medicine and rehabilitation biomechanics laboratory. Participants: All 18 enrolled participants (N = 18) completed the feasibility trial. There were 16 men and 2 women with an average age of 59.4 (±7) years. Most of the participants (61.1%) had worn a socket for 1 to 10 years before the trial, 22.2% of the participants had worn one for less than a year, and 16.7% of the participants had worn a prosthesis for more than 10 years. Intervention: Participants were fit with the study prosthesis and used it for a 2-week home trial. Main Outcome Measures: A Prosthetic Comfort and Utility Questionnaire was completed on the participant's conventional prosthetic device and the subischial socket system after the trial. Results: The adjustable subischial prostheses were rated superior overall to the participant's conventional sockets (40.9 ± 7.2 vs 32.8 ± 10.8; Conclusions: The adjustable, immediate fit, subischial prosthesis provided safe, comfortable, and functional ambulation for persons with transfemoral limb loss in this short-term feasibility study. This study supports the consideration of a new paradigm in transfemoral prosthetics-adjustable subischial sockets. These devices should be tested in a larger multi-center study.

Indexed as

Adjustable prosthesisAmputationLimb lossPCUQ, Prosthetic Comfort and Utility QuestionnairePEQ, Prosthetic Evaluation QuestionnaireProstheticTransfemoral amputationTransfemoral prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID36123976
PMCPMC9482040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.