ArticleMedicine2022
Outcomes between non-IVF and IVF treatment after laparoscopic conservative surgery of advanced endometriosis with Endometriosis Fertility Index score >3.
Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endometriosis and Reproductive Sparing Surgery: A Narrative Review and AGREE II-S-Based Evaluation of International Guidelines.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Urinary Urocortin as a Potential Non-Invasive Biomarker in Endometriosis: Exploratory Study with Histone H4.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- How does chronic endometritis influence pregnancy outcomes in endometriosis associated infertility? A retrospective cohort study.Reproductive health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical excision of advanced endometriosis has been demonstrated to improve women's pain symptoms and quality of life in women in randomized placebo-controlled trials, but there is no strong evidence regarding the live birth rate. The revised American Fertility Society (r-AFS) classification for endometriosis has a limited predictive ability for fertility outcomes after surgery; therefore, EFI scoring has been advised for predicting conception after endometriosis surgery. No randomized controlled trials have investigated fertility outcomes in patients with advanced endometriosis after surgery. This study aimed to determine the outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or non-IVF treatments after conservative surgery for advanced endometriosis in patients with good prognosis Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) scores (>3). This prospective cohort study was conducted between April 2014 and April 2019 at a tertiary research hospital. In total, 113 women with suspected preoperative advanced endometriosis were enrolled in this study. A total of 90 women with advanced endometriosis underwent laparoscopic surgery. Fourteen patients with EFI score of ≤3 and 3 of them who had bilateral tubal occlusion were also excluded. Seventy-three women were included in this study. The remaining 30 women in the non-IVF group and 32 women in the IVF group were analyzed. The main outcome measures were cumulative pregnancy rates and live birth rates in both groups. Women who underwent IVF treatment were older than women (30 ± 3.41) who had non-IVF treatment (26.5 ± 3.07) after laparoscopic surgery (P < .001). The remaining baseline characteristics of the patients in both groups were similar. Clinical pregnancy, abortion, and live birth rates were similar in both the groups after 36 months of follow-up. This study demonstrated that cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates were similar to those of non-IVF or IVF treatments after conservative surgery for advanced endometriosis, if patients had good prognosis EFI scores. Furthermore, non-IVF treatments resulted in nearly the same clinical pregnancy results as IVF treatment within 1 year after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.