Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36123706›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2022

The follicular-phase depot GnRH agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study.

Ying Zhang, Wenxian Zhao, Yifan Han, Xin Chen, Shaoyuan Xu, Yueyue Hu, Honglu Diao, Changjun Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ying Zhang *Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People's Republic of China.
Wenxian Zhao *Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People's Republic of China.
Yifan HanReproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People's Republic of China.
Xin ChenReproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People's Republic of China.
Shaoyuan XuReproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People's Republic of China.
Yueyue HuReproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People's Republic of China.
Honglu DiaoReproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People's Republic of China.
Changjun ZhangReproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People's Republic of China. changjunzhang@hotmail.com.

Funding

National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China No.82101726Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province No.2020CFA021Principal Investigator Grant of Biomedical Research Institute of Hubei University of Medicine No.HBMUPI201802Scientific Technological Project of Shiyan City of Hubei Province No.2021K64
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) has been used in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles for a long time. This paper evaluates the efficacy and safety of two commonly used protocols (follicular-phase depot GnRH-a protocol and daily mid-luteal long GnRH-a protocol) in normal responders undergoing IVF/ICSI using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

methodsA total of 6,816 infertile women treated within the period from January 2016 to September 2020 were stratified into cohorts. A total of 2,851 patients received the long-acting group (depot GnRH-a protocol), and 1,193 used the short-acting group (long GnRH-a protocol) after the data-selection process. PSM was utilized for sampling by up to 1:1 nearest neighbour matching to adjust the numerical difference and balance the confounders between groups. The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR). Multivariable logistic analysis was used to evaluate the difference between these two protocols in relation to the LBR. RESULT(S): In this study, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to create a perfect match of 964 patients in each group. After matching, the blastocyst formation rates, oestradiol (E CONCLUSION(S): Compared with the daily short-acting GnRH agonist protocol, the follicular-phase depot GnRH-a protocol might improve LBRs in normogonadotropic women without discernible differences in luteal function and child health.

Indexed as

Birth RateInfertility, FemaleChildChild HealthCohort StudiesEstradiolFemaleGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHumansLuteal PhaseMalePregnancyProgesteronePropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesSemenEstradiolGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneProgesteroneDepot GnRH agonist protocolLive birth rateLong GnRH agonist protocolLuteal supportNeonatal outcomes

Identifiers

PMID36123706
PMCPMC9483542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.