Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36123700›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2022

Persian version of the work design questionnaire: measurement of its psychometric characteristics.

Zeinab Rasouli Kahaki, Vahid Gharibi, Mojtaba Keshavarz, Rosanna Cousins, Hamidreza Mokarami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zeinab Rasouli KahakiStudent Research Committee, Department of Ergonomics, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Vahid GharibiSchool of Public Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9974-3060
Mojtaba KeshavarzStudent Research Committee, Department of Ergonomics, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Rosanna CousinsDepartment of Psychology, Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool, UK.
Hamidreza MokaramiDepartment of Ergonomics, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. hamidreza.mokarami@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1085-749X

Funding

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 98-01-42-19446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWork design questionnaire (WDQ), as a comprehensive and integrative tool, is one of the most important instruments frequently used to assess work characteristics. The aim of this study was to measure the psychometric characteristics of the Persian version of WDQ.

methodsTranslation and cross-cultural adaptation procedures were applied in translating the original WDQ into Persian. A total of 270 participants participated in this study. The validity of the questionnaire were measured using face validity, content validity, convergent validity, and construct validity based on confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was assessed through internal consistency.

resultsMean content validity index was 0.95. The CFA results indicated support for a 21-factor solution. There were significant correlations between dimensions of WDQ and both job satisfaction and perceived stress. Cronbach's alpha of all items was 0.87.

conclusionResults indicated that the WDQ exhibited very good psychometric properties and can be applied as a useful tool to assess work characteristics among Iranian employees. Accordingly, the authors recommend its administration in future studies. The work characteristics was significantly associated with job satisfaction and job stress. Therefore, improved work design would reduce negative consequences, such as job stress, and increase positive behaviors, such as job satisfaction.

Indexed as

Occupational StressHumansIranPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesIranian employeesJob characteristicsReliabilityValidityWork characteristicsWork design

Identifiers

PMID36123700
PMCPMC9484222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.