Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36123636›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Health literacy and related behaviour among pregnant women with obesity: a qualitative interpretive description study.

Maiken Meldgaard, Annesofie Lunde Jensen, Amalie Damgaard Johansen, Rikke Damkjær Maimburg, Helle Terkildsen Maindal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Health literacy and non-communicable disease knowledge of pregnant women and mothers in Tasmania: Qualitative exploration.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maiken MeldgaardDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. mme@ph.au.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4122-1793
Annesofie Lunde JensenSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2025-6663
Amalie Damgaard JohansenDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Rikke Damkjær MaimburgDepartment of Clinical Medicine & Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1776-5475
Helle Terkildsen MaindalDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0525-7254
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKSteno Diabetes Centers · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity in pregnant women is increasing worldwide, affecting the health of both mother and baby. Obesity may be associated with inadequate health literacy, a central competence when navigating antenatal health information and services. This study explores women's health literacy by examining their knowledge, motivation and skills to access, understand and evaluate health information and the related behaviour among a sample of pregnant women with a prepregnant body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg/m

methodsAn inductive, qualitative study using an interpretive description methodology. Data was collected through ten semi-structured interviews with pregnant women with a prepregnancy BMI > 25 kg/m

resultsPregnant women with obesity understand general health information provided by health professionals, but translating this knowledge into specific healthy behaviours presents a challenge. Although difficulties navigating booking systems and available digital services contribute to this problem, apps can help facilitate navigation. However, successful navigation may depend on adequate e-health literacy. Conflicting information from health professionals, social media and families also present a challenge for pregnant women, requiring a broad skillset for critical evaluation and resolution.

conclusionsAdequate health literacy is necessary for pregnant women receiving antenatal care to (i) translate general health information into personalised healthy behaviour, (ii) access and navigate complex and digitalised systems, and (iii) critically evaluate conflicting information. Person-centred differentiation in the organisation of antenatal care may benefit vulnerable pregnant women with inadequate health literacy.

trial registrationThe study was registered cf. General Data Protection Regulation, Aarhus University Journal number 2016-051-000001, serial number 1934.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyPregnant PeopleBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansInfantObesityPregnancyQualitative ResearchHealth care serviceHealth literacyObesityOverweightPregnancyPrevention

Identifiers

PMID36123636
PMCPMC9483451
OpenAlexW4296295848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.