ReviewBMC medical research methodology2022
Joint models for dynamic prediction in localised prostate cancer: a literature review.
Review in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reflections on dynamic prediction of Alzheimer's disease: advancements in modeling longitudinal outcomes and time-to-event data.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Pooled it
- Post-SABR early PSA density kinetics in androgen deprivation therapy-naïve patients: early landmark models for long-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Evaluating the application of dynamic prediction models in oncological prognostic studies with repeated measurement predictors.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Personalized prognostic model for colorectal cancer in the era of precision medicine: a dynamic approach based on real-world data.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- A sample size analysis of a mathematical model of longitudinal tumor volume and progression-free survival for Bayesian individual dynamic predictions in recurrent high-grade glioma.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
- A Bayesian Joint Model of Multiple Nonlinear Longitudinal and Competing Risks Outcomes for Dynamic Prediction in Multiple Myeloma: Joint Estimation and Corrected Two-Stage Approaches.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Survival path model outperforms conventional static machine learning models in long-term dynamic prognosis prediction for patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- An inverse lomax-uniform poisson distribution and joint modeling of repeatedly measured and time-to-event data in the health sectors.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- A literature review to understand health literacy in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer is a very prevalent disease in men. Patients are monitored regularly during and after treatment with repeated assessment of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Prognosis of localised prostate cancer is generally good after treatment, and the risk of having a recurrence is usually estimated based on factors measured at diagnosis. Incorporating PSA measurements over time in a dynamic prediction joint model enables updates of patients' risk as new information becomes available. We review joint model strategies that have been applied to model time-dependent PSA trajectories to predict time-to-event outcomes in localised prostate cancer.
methodsWe identify articles that developed joint models for prediction of localised prostate cancer recurrence over the last two decades. We report, compare, and summarise the methodological approaches and applications that use joint modelling accounting for two processes: the longitudinal model (PSA), and the time-to-event process (clinical failure). The methods explored differ in how they specify the association between these two processes.
resultsTwelve relevant articles were identified. A range of methodological frameworks were found, and we describe in detail shared-parameter joint models (9 of 12, 75%) and joint latent class models (3 of 12, 25%). Within each framework, these articles presented model development, estimation of dynamic predictions and model validations.
conclusionsEach framework has its unique principles with corresponding advantages and differing interpretations. Regardless of the framework used, dynamic prediction models enable real-time prediction of individual patient prognosis. They utilise all available longitudinal information, in addition to baseline prognostic risk factors, and are superior to traditional baseline-only prediction models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.