ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2022
Frequency and correlates of driving status among the oldest old: results from a large, representative sample.
Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between the Japanese Version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Tasks and Driving as the Primary Mode of Transport Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2026Article
- Perception of one's social environment and loneliness: results of the nationally representative "Old age in Germany (D80+)" study.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2025Article
- Smartphone App-Based and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes Using a Disease-Specific Questionnaire for Dry Eye Disease: Randomized Crossover Equivalence Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsIn the light of the restricted knowledge, our aim was to explore the frequency and correlates of driving status among the oldest old.
methodsData came from the representative "Survey on quality of life and subjective well-being of the very old in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW80 +)" consisting of community-dwelling and institutionalized individuals ≥ 80 years residing in the most populous German state (North Rhine-Westphalia; n = 1,832 in the analytical sample, mean age: 86.5 years). The present driving status (no; yes, I drive myself; yes, as a passenger; yes, as driver and passenger) served as outcome measure.
resultsOverall, 43.62% (95% CI 40.98-46.29%) of the individuals did not drive, whereas 30.12% (95% CI 27.75-32.59%) of the individuals drove by themselves, 20.97% (95% CI 18.91-23.20%) of the individuals drove as a passenger, and 5.29% of the individuals drove both (by themselves and as a passenger) (95% CI 4.16-6.71%). Multinomial logistic regressions showed, e.g., that being male (RRR: 0.13, 95% CI 0.09-0.18), younger age (RRR: 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.91), being married and living together with spouse (RRR: 1.48, 95% CI 1.08-2.02), living in a private household (RRR: 0.04, 95% CI 0.01-0.35), better self-rated health (RRR: 1.26, 95% CI 1.02-1.56), and lower functional impairment (RRR: 19.82, 95% CI 12.83-30.62) were positively associated with 'Yes, I drive myself' (compared to not driving a car). DISCUSSION/
conclusionsA sizable proportion of the individuals aged 80 years and above still drove by themselves. Less than half of the oldest old individuals did not drive. Moreover, our current study identified some correlates of driving status among individuals in latest life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.