ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023
Training and assessment using the LapSim laparoscopic simulator: a scoping review of validity evidence.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Augmented reality for basic skills training in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Spaced Digital Education for Health Professionals: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Development and validation of an artificial intelligence-powered 3D digital twin for teaching and assessing retraction for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Knowledge Acquisition, Self-Assessed Competence, and Simulator-Based Performance in a Structured Laparoscopic VR Curriculum for Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents: A Single-Center Observational Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Simulation-based training and education in laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Simulation speeds up adaptation to the 3D exoscope: a randomized controlled trial.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Using virtual reality simulation to ensure laparoscopic camera navigation skills of new surgical assistants-a validation study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- The development of a novel virtual reality simulation module for canine laparoscopic ovariectomy.Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a simulation-based assessment of operative competence for higher specialist trainees in general surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Effective Use of Laparoscopic Simulators in Gynecological Training.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe LapSim (Surgical Science, Sweden) laparoscopic simulator is a high-fidelity virtual reality simulator for use in endoscopic surgical training. This review critiques the current validity evidence for the LapSim laparoscopic simulator, specifically with respect to its potential use as a tool and method of training and assessment in surgery.
methodsA scoping review of the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science databases was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (2020)-scoping review extension. Articles were included if they presented validity evidence for the use of the LapSim in operative skill training or assessment, in accordance with Messick's validity framework. European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) guidelines (2005) were used to provide recommendations for the use of the LapSim in operative performance training and assessments.
resultsForty-nine articles were included. An EAES level 2 recommendation was provided with regard to the internal consistency reliability of automated performance metrics in assessing performance. An EAES recommendation of 2 was awarded with respect to the ability of the LapSim to discriminate based on case volume and overall laparoscopic experience (relationships with other variables). Performance assessment metrics on the LapSim correlate with improved performance in the operating room (EAES level of recommendation 1-consequential validity).
conclusionThe LapSim has accumulated substantial evidence supporting the validity of its use in surgical training and assessment. Future studies should explore the relationship between the achievement of performance benchmarks on the LapSim and subsequent patient outcomes, and interrogate the benefits of implementing virtual reality simulation training and assessment curricula in post-graduate surgical training programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.