Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36123437›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022

Frontline Physician Perspectives on Their Experiences Working During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Cristina M Gonzalez, Onjona Hossain, Monica E Peek

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina M GonzalezAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. crgonzal@montefiore.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9779-6548
Onjona HossainAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Monica E PeekUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Does Implicit Bias Influence Medical Decision-Making? Developing and Validating Novel Models and Outcome MetricsK23MD014178 · NIMHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GONZALEZ, CRISTINA M · 2019 to 2023
$853k
NIMHD NIH HHS K23MD014178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic physicians worked on the front lines, immersed in uncertainty. Research into perspectives of frontline physicians has lagged behind clinical innovation throughout the pandemic.

objectiveTo inform ongoing and future efforts in the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a qualitative exploration of physician perspectives of the effects of policies and procedures as well as lessons learned while caring for patients during the height of the first wave in the spring of 2020.

designA confidential survey was emailed to a convenience sample. Survey questions included demographic data, participant role in the pandemic, and geographic location. Eleven open-ended questions explored their perspectives and advice they would give going forward. Broad areas covered included COVID-19-specific education, discharge planning, unintended consequences for patient care, mental health conditions to anticipate, and personal/institutional factors influencing workforce well-being amid the crisis.

participantsWe received fifty-five surveys from May through July 2020. Demographic data demonstrated sampling of frontline physicians working in various epicenters in the USA, and diversity in gender, race/ethnicity, and clinical specialty. APPROACH: Inductive thematic analysis. KEY

resultsFour themes emerged through data analysis: (1) Leadership can make or break morale; (2) Leadership should engage frontline workers throughout decision-making processes; (3) Novelty of COVID-19 led to unintended consequences in care delivery; and (4) Mental health sequelae will be profound and pervasive.

conclusionsOur participants demonstrated the benefit of engaging frontline physicians as important stakeholders in policy generation, evaluation, and revision; they highlighted challenges, successes, unintended consequences, and lessons learned from various epicenters in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is much to be learned from the early COVID-19 pandemic crisis; our participants' insights elucidate opportunities to examine institutional performance, effect policy change, and improve crisis management in order to better prepare for this and future pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansHumansLeadershipMental HealthPandemicsCOVID-19crisis managementhealthcare systemphysician perspectivesstakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID36123437
PMCPMC9484839
OpenAlexW4296336319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.