ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2022
Clinical impact of blood pressure on cardiovascular death in patients 80 years and older following acute myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous trials have shown that lowering blood pressure (BP) reduces cardiovascular risk and mortality, yet data about the impact of BP on cardiovascular death risk in patients aged ≥80 years with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are sparse. This study explored the prognostic value of BP for cardiovascular death during the first 48 h after admission following AMI among patients aged ≥80 years. A total of 1005 patients ≥80 years with AMI were enrolled. Average BP parameters, including systolic, diastolic, and pulse BP, over the first 48 h after admission were calculated. The end point was cardiovascular death. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to identify whether BP was relevant to cardiovascular death. The relationship between BP levels and cardiovascular death was evaluated by Cox regression models. ROC analysis showed that average diastolic blood pressure (aDBP), but not systolic and pulse BP, was relevant to cardiovascular death, and the optimal cutoff was 65 mmHg. During the 2.9-year follow-up, patients who died from a cardiovascular cause had lower aDBP levels than those who did not (p = 0.002). Patients with aDBP <65 mmHg had a 1.5-fold higher incidence of cardiovascular death than those with aDBP ≥65 mmHg (35.9% vs. 24.0%; p < 0.001). In multivariable regression analysis, low aDBP remained a strong and independent predictor of cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio 1.907; 95% CI 1.303-2.792). aDBP was independently associated with cardiovascular death in patients aged ≥80 years with AMI, suggesting that aDBP may be a useful index to predict worse outcome in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.