Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36123109›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Acceptability of text messages and knowledge change for cervical cancer screening: a Tanzanian mixed methods study.

Kristian Foldager Løkke, Vibeke Rasch, Julius Mwaiselage, Tine Gammeltoft, Ditte Søndergaard Linde

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02509702 (Text Messages to Increase Attendance to Follow-up Cervical Cancer Screening Appointments Among HPV Positive Tanzanian Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02509702 nacompletednot on this map

Text Messages to Increase Attendance to Follow-up Cervical Cancer Screening Appointments Among HPV Positive Tanzanian Women (Connected2Care)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarianne AndersenRan2015 to 2019Enrolled705ConditionsCervical CancerArmsConnected to Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristian Foldager LøkkeDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6121-0840
Vibeke RaschDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6557-0985
Julius MwaiselageDepartment for Cancer Prevention Services, Ocean Road Cancer Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-0322-9981
Tine GammeltoftDepartment of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6723-2370
Ditte Søndergaard LindeDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark dsondergaard@health.sdu.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-0851-6760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the acceptability of a text message intervention and evaluate if text messages could increase knowledge of cervical cancer and screening.

designThis study was a substudy of a randomised controlled trial that used a mixed methods research design combining a quantitative questionnaire dataset and qualitative interview data. A before and after assessment was made of questionnaire responses. Acceptability was measured on a 6-point Likert scale and knowledge was measured through 16 binary true/false knowledge questions concerning cervical cancer and screening. Qualitative data were coded using a combined inductive-deductive approach.

settingOcean Road Cancer Institute in Dar es Salaam as well as Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center and Mawenzi Regional hospital in the Kilimanjaro Region in Tanzania.

participantsHuman papillomavirus (HPV) positive women who had been randomised to the intervention group and received educative and reminder messages. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subgroup of women in the intervention group.

interventions15 one-way educative and reminder text messages.

resultsA total of 115 women in the intervention group responded to both the baseline and follow-up questionnaire. Overall, women found it highly acceptable to receive text messages, and there was a trend towards acceptability rising between baseline and follow-up (mean: 0.22; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.44; p=0.05; t-statics=1.96). A significant increase in acceptability was found among the lowest educated and those who had not previously been screened. The qualitative interviews showed that the underlying reasons for the high acceptability rate were that the women felt someone cared for them and that the text messages were for their own benefits. The text messages did not improve the women's knowledge on cervical cancer and screening.

conclusionsEducative and reminder text messages are highly acceptable among HPV-positive Tanzanian women; however, they do not increase the women's knowledge of cervical cancer and screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clingov (NCT02509702).

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsText MessagingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansTanzaniagynaecological oncologyhealth informaticsinternational health servicespublic health

Identifiers

PMID36123109
PMCPMC9486230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.