Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36123087›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Child and family-focused interventions for child maltreatment and domestic abuse: development of core outcome sets.

Claire Powell, Gene Feder, Ruth Gilbert, Laura Paulauskaite, Eszter Szilassy, Jenny Woodman, Emma Howarth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claire PowellPopulation, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK c.powell@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6581-0165
Gene FederCentre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol University, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7890-3926
Ruth GilbertPopulation, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9347-2709
Laura PaulauskaiteInstitute of Education, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7892-8103
Eszter SzilassyCentre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jenny WoodmanSocial Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9403-4177
Emma HowarthSchool of Psychology, University of East London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3969-7883
University College London · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of East London · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current evidence for child maltreatment (CM) and domestic violence and abuse (DVA) interventions is limited by the diversity of outcomes evaluated and the variety of measures used. The result is studies that are difficult to compare and lack focus on outcomes reflecting service user or provider priorities.

objectiveTo develop core outcome sets (COSs) for evaluations of child and family-focused interventions for: (1) CM and (2) DVA.

designWe conducted a two-stage consensus process. Stage 1: a long list of candidate outcomes across CM and DVA was developed through rapid systematic reviews of intervention studies, qualitative and grey literature; stakeholder workshops; survivor interviews. Stage 2: three-panel, three-round e-Delphi surveys for CM and DVA with consensus meetings to agree with the final COSs.

participants287 stakeholders participated in at least one stage of the process (ie, either CM or DVA COS development): workshops (n=76), two e-Delphi surveys (n=170) and consensus meetings (n=43). Stakeholders included CM and DVA survivors, practitioners, commissioners, policymakers and researchers.

resultsStage 1 identified 335 outcomes categorised into 9 areas and 39 domains. Following stage 2, the final five outcomes included in the CM-COS were: child emotional health and well-being; child's trusted relationships; feelings of safety; child abuse and neglect; service harms. The final five outcomes in the DVA-COS were: child emotional health and well-being; caregiver emotional health and well-being; family relationships; freedom to go about daily life; feelings of safety.

conclusionsWe developed two COSs for CM and DVA with two common outcomes (child emotional health and well-being; feelings of safety). The COSs reflect shared priorities among service users, providers and researchers. Use of these COSs across trials and service evaluations for children and families affected by CM and DVA will make outcome selection more consistent and help harmonise research and practice.

Indexed as

Child AbuseDomestic ViolenceChildFamily RelationsHumansMental HealthOutcome Assessment, Health CareChild protectionCommunity child healthPRIMARY CAREPUBLIC HEALTHSOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID36123087
PMCPMC9486347
OpenAlexW4296418620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.