Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36123066›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Evaluating the effectiveness of email-based nudges to reduce postoperative opioid prescribing: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Allison Kirkegaard, Zachary Wagner, Louis T Mariano, Meghan C Martinez, Xiaowei Sherry Yan, Robert J Romanelli, Katherine E Watkins

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05070338 (Reducing Inappropriate Prescription Opioid Prescribing at Hospital Discharge), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05070338 nacompletednot on this map

Reducing Inappropriate Prescription Opioid Prescribing at Hospital Discharge

TypeinterventionalSponsorRANDRan2021 to 2023Enrolled640ConditionsOpioid PrescribingArmsGuideline-Based (Injunctive Norm) Nudges, Peer-Based (Social Norm) Nudges
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Health disparities in neurology.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Allison KirkegaardRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA allisonk@rand.org.ORCID 0000-0002-2924-9868
Zachary WagnerRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Louis T MarianoRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Meghan C MartinezCenter for Health Systems Research (West), Palo Alto, California, USA.
Xiaowei Sherry YanCenter for Health Systems Research (East), Walnut Creek, California, USA.
Robert J RomanelliRAND Europe, Cambridge, UK.
Katherine E WatkinsRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.
RAND Corporation · USRAND Europe · GB

Funding

REDUCING INAPPROPRIATE PRESCRIPTION OPIOID PRESCRIBING AT HOSPITAL DISCHARGER01DA046226 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI WATKINS, KATHERINE E · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurgical patients are commonly prescribed more opioids at discharge than needed to manage their postoperative pain. These excess opioids increase the risks of new persistent opioid use, opioid-induced ventilatory impairment and opioid diversion. This study tests the effectiveness of two behavioural nudges, one based on peer behaviour and one based on best practice guidelines, in reducing excessive postoperative opioid prescriptions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will be conducted at 19 hospitals within a large healthcare delivery system in northern California, USA. Three surgical specialties (general surgery, orthopaedic surgery and obstetric/gynaecological surgery) at each hospital will be randomised either to a control group or to one of two active intervention arms. One intervention is grounded in the theory of injunctive norms, and provides feedback to surgeons on their postoperative opioid prescribing relative to prescribing guidelines endorsed by their institution. The other intervention draws from the theory of descriptive norms, and provides feedback similar to the first intervention but using peers' behaviour rather than guidelines as the benchmark for the surgeon's prescribing behaviour. The interventions will be delivered by a monthly email. Both interventions will be active for twelve months. The effects of each intervention relative to the control group and to each other will be tested using a four-level hierarchical model adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Using behavioural nudges rather than rigid policy changes allows us to target excessive prescribing without preventing clinicians from using their clinical judgement to address patient pain. All study activities have been approved by the RAND Human Subjects Protection Committee (ID 2018-0988). Findings will be disseminated through conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications and social media accounts. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05070338.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidElectronic MailPostoperative PainPractice Patterns, Physicians'HumansMulticenter Studies as TopicOpioid-Related DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesics, OpioidHealth & safetyPAIN MANAGEMENTProtocols & guidelinesPUBLIC HEALTHQuality in health careSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID36123066
PMCPMC9486294
OpenAlexW4296385133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.