Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36123052›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Implementation of the Afya conditional cash transfer intervention to retain women in the continuum of care: a mixed-methods process evaluation.

Sarah Dickin, Fedra Vanhuyse, Oliver Stirrup, Carla Liera, Andrew Copas, Aloyce Odhiambo, Tom Palmer, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli, Neha Batura, Alex Mwaki and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03021070 (Afya Credit Incentives for Improved Maternal and Child Health Outcomes in Kenya), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03021070 naunknown statusnot on this map

Afya Credit Incentives for Improved Maternal and Child Health Outcomes in Kenya

TypeinterventionalSponsorOnyango SangoroRan2017 to 2019Enrolled7,200ConditionsMaternal and Child HealthArmsConditional cash transfer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah DickinStockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden sarah.dickin@sei.org.ORCID 0000-0003-0437-3755
Fedra VanhuyseStockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9283-1914
Oliver StirrupInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Carla LieraStockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andrew CopasInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-5963
Aloyce OdhiamboSafe Water and AIDS Project, Kisumu, Kenya.
Tom PalmerInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Hassan Haghparast-BidgoliInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6365-2944
Neha BaturaInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8175-8125
Alex MwakiSafe Water and AIDS Project, Kisumu, Kenya.
Jolene SkordisInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe report the results of a mixed-methods process evaluation that aimed to provide insight on the Afya conditional cash transfer (CCT) intervention fidelity and acceptability. INTERVENTION, SETTING AND

participantsThe Afya CCT intervention aimed to retain women in the continuum of maternal healthcare including antenatal care (ANC), delivery at facility and postnatal care (PNC) in Siaya County, Kenya. The cash transfers were delivered using an electronic card reader system at health facilities. It was evaluated in a trial that randomised 48 health facilities to intervention or control, and which found modest increases in attendance for ANC and immunisation appointments, but little effect on delivery at facility and PNC visits.

designA mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted. We used the Afya electronic portal with recorded visits and payments, and reports on use of the electronic card reader system from each healthcare facility to assess fidelity. Focus group interviews with participants (N=5) and one-on-one interviews with participants (N=10) and healthcare staff (N=15) were conducted to assess the acceptability of the intervention. Data analyses were conducted using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis, as appropriate.

resultsDelivery of the Afya CCT intervention was negatively affected by problems with the electronic card reader system and a decrease in adherence to its use over the intervention period by healthcare staff, resulting in low implementation fidelity. Acceptability of cash transfers in the form of mobile transfers was high for participants. Initially, the intervention was acceptable to healthcare staff, especially with respect to improvements in attaining facility targets for ANC visits. However, acceptability was negatively affected by significant delays linked to the card reader system.

conclusionsThe findings highlight operational challenges in delivering the Afya CCT intervention using the Afya electronic card reader system, and the need for greater technology readiness before further scale-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03021070.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesPrenatal CareContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHumansKenyaPregnancyCommunity child healthMaternal medicinePUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID36123052
PMCPMC9486356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.