Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36123048›Full record

ArticleComparative medicine2022

Calcium Chloride Toxicology for Food Safety Assessment Using Zebrafish (

Ricardo Lacava Bailone, Hirla Costa Silva Fukushima, Luis Kluwe de Aguiar, Ricardo Carneiro Borra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Pill That Prints-An Ingestible Bioprinter for Non-Invasive Structured Bioink Deposition.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ricardo Lacava BailoneDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil; Department of Federal Inspection Service, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply of Brazil, São Carlos, Brazil; ricardo., Email: bailone@agricultura.gov.br.
Hirla Costa Silva FukushimaCenter of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos Brazil.
Luis Kluwe de AguiarDepartment of Food, Land and Agribusiness Management, Harper Adams University, Newport, United Kingdom.
Ricardo Carneiro BorraDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The salt calcium chloride (CaCl₂) is widely used in industry as a food additive; levels for human consumption are regulated by international or governmental agencies. Generally, the food industry relies on toxicity studies conducted in mammals such as mice, rats, and rabbits for determining food safety. However, testing in mammals is time-consuming and expensive. Zebrafish have been used in a range of toxicological analyses and offer advantages with regard to sensitivity, time, and cost. However, information in not available with regard to whether the sensitivity of zebrafish to CaCl₂ is comparable to the concentrations of CaCl₂ used as food additives. The aim of this study was to compare the CaCl₂ tolerance of zebrafish embryos and larvae with concentrations currently approved as food additives. Acute toxicity, embryotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and neurotoxicity assays were used to determine the threshold toxic concentration of CaCl₂ in zebrafish embryos and larvae. The data showed that doses above 0.4% had toxic effects on development and on the activity of the cardiac and neuronal systems. Furthermore, all embryos exposed to 0.8 and 1.6% of CaCl₂ died after 24 hpf. These findings are consistent with the limits of CaCl₂ concentrations approved by

Indexed as

Embryo, NonmammalianZebrafishAnimalsCalcium ChlorideFood AdditivesFood SafetyHumansLarvaMammalsMiceRabbitsRatsCalcium ChlorideFood Additives

Identifiers

PMID36123048
PMCPMC9827598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.