Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36122935›Full record

ArticleLife science alliance2022

A critique of the hypothesis that CA repeats are primary targets of neuronal MeCP2.

Kashyap Chhatbar, John Connelly, Shaun Webb, Skirmantas Kriaucionis, Adrian Bird

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life science alliance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kashyap ChhatbarWellcome Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, The Michael Swann Building, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2863-7850
John ConnellyWellcome Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, The Michael Swann Building, Edinburgh, UK.
Shaun WebbWellcome Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, The Michael Swann Building, Edinburgh, UK.
Skirmantas KriaucionisLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2273-5994
Adrian BirdWellcome Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, The Michael Swann Building, Edinburgh, UK a.bird@ed.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8600-0372
Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 107930/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DNA-binding protein MeCP2 is reported to bind methylated cytosine in CG and CA motifs in genomic DNA, but it was recently proposed that arrays of tandemly repeated CA containing either methylated or hydroxymethylated cytosine are the primary targets for MeCP2 binding and function. Here we investigated the predictions of this hypothesis using a range of published datasets. We failed to detect enrichment of cytosine modification at genomic CA repeat arrays in mouse brain regions and found no evidence for preferential MeCP2 binding at CA repeats. Moreover, we did not observe a correlation between the CA repeat density near genes and their degree of transcriptional deregulation when MeCP2 was absent. Our results do not provide support for the hypothesis that CA repeats are key mediators of MeCP2 function. Instead, we found that CA repeats are subject to CAC methylation to a degree that is typical of the surrounding genome and contribute modestly to MeCP2-mediated modulation of gene expression in accordance with their content of this canonical target motif.

Indexed as

Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2AnimalsCytosineDNADNA MethylationMiceNeuronsCytosineDNAMecp2 protein, mouseMethyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2

Identifiers

PMID36122935
PMCPMC9485053
OpenAlexW4296378260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.