Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36122603›Full record

ReviewAnalytical biochemistry2022

A review post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 serological test: Method and antibody titer response.

Melania Janisha Devi, Shabarni Gaffar, Yeni Wahyuni Hartati

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical biochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melania Janisha DeviDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia.
Shabarni GaffarDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia.
Yeni Wahyuni HartatiDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia. Electronic address: yeni.w.hartati@unpad.ac.id.
Padjadjaran University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine is one of the most important efforts in controlling the pandemic. Serological tests are used to identify highly reactive human donors for convalescent plasma therapy, measuring vaccine efficacy and durability. This review article presents a review of serology tests and how antibody titers in response to vaccines have been developed. Some of the serological test methods discussed are Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT), Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), Lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), and Chemiluminescent Micro-particle Immunoassay (CMIA). This review can provide an understanding of the application of the body's immune response to vaccines to get some new strategies for vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralClinical Laboratory TechniquesCOVID-19 SerotherapyEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansSerologic TestsVaccinationAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19Immune titerSerologist methodVaccine

Identifiers

PMID36122603
PMCPMC9481475
OpenAlexW4296182676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.