ArticleBiochemistry2022
Recognition of DNA Supercoil Handedness during Catenation Catalyzed by Type II Topoisomerases.
Article in Biochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Telling Your Right Hand from Your Left: The Effects of DNA Supercoil Handedness on the Actions of Type II Topoisomerases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although the presence of catenanes (i.e., intermolecular tangles) in chromosomal DNA stabilizes interactions between daughter chromosomes, a lack of resolution can have serious consequences for genomic stability. In all species, from bacteria to humans, type II topoisomerases are the enzymes primarily responsible for catenating/decatenating DNA. DNA topology has a profound influence on the rate at which these enzymes alter the superhelical state of the double helix. Therefore, the effect of supercoil handedness on the ability of human topoisomerase IIα and topoisomerase IIβ and bacterial topoisomerase IV to catenate DNA was examined. Topoisomerase IIα preferentially catenated negatively supercoiled over positively supercoiled substrates. This is opposite to its preference for relaxing (i.e., removing supercoils from) DNA and may prevent the enzyme from tangling the double helix ahead of replication forks and transcription complexes. The ability of topoisomerase IIα to recognize DNA supercoil handedness during catenation resides in its C-terminal domain. In contrast to topoisomerase IIα, topoisomerase IIβ displayed little ability to distinguish DNA geometry during catenation. Topoisomerase IV from three bacterial species preferentially catenated positively supercoiled substrates. This may not be an issue, as these enzymes work primarily behind replication forks. Finally, topoisomerase IIα and topoisomerase IV maintain lower levels of covalent enzyme-cleaved DNA intermediates with catenated over monomeric DNA. This allows these enzymes to perform their cellular functions in a safer manner, as catenated daughter chromosomes may be subject to stress generated by the mitotic spindle that could lead to irreversible DNA cleavage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.