Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36122225›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Direct visualization of translesion DNA synthesis polymerase IV at the replisome.

Pham Minh Tuan, Neville S Gilhooly, Kenneth J Marians, Stephen C Kowalczykowski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RecBCD-dependent post-UV replication restart inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Regulation of phosphate starvation-specific responses inMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pham Minh TuanDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Neville S GilhoolyDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Kenneth J MariansMolecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065.
Stephen C KowalczykowskiDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0002-9127-3949
University of California, Davis · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Mechanisms of DNA Replication, Chromosome Compaction, and Chromosome UnlinkingR35GM126907 · NIGMS · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI KENNETH J MARIANS · 2018 to 2026
$8.8M
Single-molecule Visualization and Mechanisms of DNA Recombination and Intersecting DNA TransactionsR35GM131900 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Stephen Charles Kowalczykowski · 2019 to 2026
$6.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126907NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In bacterial cells, DNA damage tolerance is manifested by the action of translesion DNA polymerases that can synthesize DNA across template lesions that typically block the replicative DNA polymerase III. It has been suggested that one of these translesion DNA synthesis DNA polymerases, DNA polymerase IV, can either act in concert with the replisome, switching places on the β sliding clamp with DNA polymerase III to bypass the template damage, or act subsequent to the replisome skipping over the template lesion in the gap in nascent DNA left behind as the replisome continues downstream. Evidence exists in support of both mechanisms. Using single-molecule analyses, we show that DNA polymerase IV associates with the replisome in a concentration-dependent manner and remains associated over long stretches of replication fork progression under unstressed conditions. This association slows the replisome, requires DNA polymerase IV binding to the β clamp but not its catalytic activity, and is reinforced by the presence of the γ subunit of the β clamp-loading DnaX complex in the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. Thus, DNA damage is not required for association of DNA polymerase IV with the replisome. We suggest that under stress conditions such as induction of the SOS response, the association of DNA polymerase IV with the replisome provides both a surveillance/bypass mechanism and a means to slow replication fork progression, thereby reducing the frequency of collisions with template damage and the overall mutagenic potential.

Indexed as

DNA Polymerase betaDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase IIIHoloenzymesDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase betaDNA Polymerase IIIHoloenzymesDNA repairDNA replicationreplisomesingle-molecule visualizationtranslesion DNA synthesis

Identifiers

PMID36122225
PMCPMC9522359
OpenAlexW4296459183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.