Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36121895›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Longitudinal monitoring of prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminth infections as part of community-wide mass drug administration within the Geshiyaro project in the Bolosso Sore district, Wolaita, Ethiopia.

Toby Landeryou, Rosie Maddren, Santiago Rayment Gomez, Suprabhath Kalahasti, Ewnetu Firdawek Liyew, Melkie Chernet, Hussein Mohammed, Yonas Wuletaw, James Truscott, Anna E Phillips and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Predisposition to Ascaris lumbricoides reinfection in the Geshiyaro project in southern Ethiopia.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Toby LanderyouLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, St Marys Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6025-1336
Rosie MaddrenLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, St Marys Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Santiago Rayment GomezLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, St Marys Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Suprabhath KalahastiLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, St Marys Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ewnetu Firdawek LiyewBacterial, Parasitic and Zoonotic Diseases Research Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Melkie ChernetBacterial, Parasitic and Zoonotic Diseases Research Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Hussein MohammedBacterial, Parasitic and Zoonotic Diseases Research Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Yonas WuletawBacterial, Parasitic and Zoonotic Diseases Research Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
James TruscottLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, St Marys Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anna E PhillipsLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, St Marys Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alison OwerLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, St Marys Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kathryn ForbesLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, St Marys Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ufaysa AnjuloDisease Prevention and Health Promotion Core Process, Ministry of Health, Wolaita, Ethiopia.
Birhan MengistuChildren's Investment fund Foundation, London, United Kingdom.
Geremew TasewDisease Prevention and Health Promotion Core Process, Ministry of Health, Wolaita, Ethiopia.
Mihretab SalasibewChildren's Investment fund Foundation, London, United Kingdom.
Roy AndersonLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, St Marys Campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research · GBEthiopian Public Health Institute · ETChildren's Investment Fund Foundation · GBFederal Ministry of Health · ET

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass drug administration (MDA), targeted at school-aged children (SAC) is recommended by the World Health Organization for the control of morbidity induced by soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infection in endemic countries. However, MDA does not prevent reinfection between treatment rounds, and research suggests that only treating SAC will not be sufficient to interrupt transmission of STH. In countries with endemic infection, such as Ethiopia, the coverage, community-groups targeted, and rates of reinfection will determine how effective MDA is in suppressing transmission in the long-term. In this paper, individually-linked longitudinal data from three epidemiological STH surveys conducted between November 2018 and November 2020 in the Wolaita region of Ethiopia are analysed to determine how STH prevalence and intensity changes according to individual level treatment data collected over two rounds of MDA. This study demonstrates that while community-wide MDA successfully reduces overall infection intensity across the villages treated, the observed levels of non-compliance to treatment by individuals acts to maintain levels of parasite abundance whereby transmission interruption is not possible at to, despite reasonable levels of MDA coverage in the communities studied (ranging from 65% to 84% of the village populations). This quantifies with substantial data the often-postulated difference between coverage (accepting treatment) and compliance (swallowing of treatment), the latter impacting the former to a previously unquantified level. The paper highlights the need to focus treatment to partially treated, or never treated groups of individuals within existing community wide MDA control activities to interrupt the transmission of STH, and to reduce the basic reproductive number, R0, of the parasites to less than unity in value.

Indexed as

AnthelminticsHelminthiasisHelminthsAnimalsChildEthiopiaHumansMass Drug AdministrationPrevalenceReinfectionSoilAnthelminticsSoil

Identifiers

PMID36121895
PMCPMC9521932
OpenAlexW4296326251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.