ArticlePLoS medicine2022
Exposure to wildfire-related PM2.5 and site-specific cancer mortality in Brazil from 2010 to 2016: A retrospective study.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health effects of wildfire PM2.5 in Latin American cities: A rapid systematic review and comparative synthesis.Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2025Pooled it
- Ambient air pollution and urological cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence.Nature communications · 2024Pooled it
- Health Effects of Wildfire Smoke Exposure.Annual review of medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Multiyear wildfire smoke exposure (MultiWiSE) metrics: a data-driven approach to characterizing episodic PMJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Article
- Two-way fixed effects models in air pollution epidemiology: a proposed framework for model specifications and recommendations for future studies.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Challenges Associated with Monitoring Long-Term Health Effects After a Major Accident: Lessons from a Large Chemical Fire in England.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Causal effects of wildfire PMNature communications · 2026Article
- Health risk assessment of wildfire smoke exposure: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Mortality in relation to smoke exposure 9 years after the Hazelwood coal mine fire.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Current status and advances in research on the impact and mechanisms of atmospheric pollutants on gastric cancer: a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Wildfire smoke PMScience advances · 2026Article
- Review
- Multi-omics analysis linksTranslational cancer research · 2026Article
- Article
- Long-term exposure to wildfire smoke and mortality: Heterogeneous effects by exposure metric and across subpopulations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- The overlooked global reach of wildfire smoke: beyond local health and cancer risk.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Article
- Wildfire Exposure and Respiratory Health: A Comprehensive Review of Emerging Evidence.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2025Article
- Exposure to outdoor air pollution, wildfires, and cancer survival in the United States.Cancer epidemiology · 2025Article
- Impact of PM2.5 exposure on acute toxicities and survival outcomes in radiotherapy for cervical cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancing new metrics for wildfire smoke exposure: case study in Alaska to bridge public health, climate adaptation, and fire management.Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site] · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong-term exposure to fine particles ≤2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5) has been linked to cancer mortality. However, the effect of wildfire-related PM2.5 exposure on cancer mortality risk is unknown. This study evaluates the association between wildfire-related PM2.5 and site-specific cancer mortality in Brazil, from 2010 to 2016. METHODS AND
findingsNationwide cancer death records were collected during 2010-2016 from the Brazilian Mortality Information System. Death records were linked with municipal-level wildfire- and non-wildfire-related PM2.5 concentrations, at a resolution of 2.0° latitude by 2.5° longitude. We applied a variant difference-in-differences approach with quasi-Poisson regression, adjusting for seasonal temperature and gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the exposure for specific cancer sites were estimated. Attributable fractions and cancer deaths were also calculated. In total, 1,332,526 adult cancer deaths (age ≥ 20 years), from 5,565 Brazilian municipalities, covering 136 million adults were included. The mean annual wildfire-related PM2.5 concentration was 2.38 μg/m3, and the annual non-wildfire-related PM2.5 concentration was 8.20 μg/m3. The RR for mortality from all cancers was 1.02 (95% CI 1.01-1.03, p < 0.001) per 1-μg/m3 increase of wildfire-related PM2.5 concentration, which was higher than the RR per 1-μg/m3 increase of non-wildfire-related PM2.5 (1.01 [95% CI 1.00-1.01], p = 0.007, with p for difference = 0.003). Wildfire-related PM2.5 was associated with mortality from cancers of the nasopharynx (1.10 [95% CI 1.04-1.16], p = 0.002), esophagus (1.05 [95% CI 1.01-1.08], p = 0.012), stomach (1.03 [95% CI 1.01-1.06], p = 0.017), colon/rectum (1.08 [95% CI 1.05-1.11], p < 0.001), larynx (1.06 [95% CI 1.02-1.11], p = 0.003), skin (1.06 [95% CI 1.00-1.12], p = 0.003), breast (1.04 [95% CI 1.01-1.06], p = 0.007), prostate (1.03 [95% CI 1.01-1.06], p = 0.019), and testis (1.10 [95% CI 1.03-1.17], p = 0.002). For all cancers combined, the attributable deaths were 37 per 100,000 population and ranged from 18/100,000 in the Northeast Region of Brazil to 71/100,000 in the Central-West Region. Study limitations included a potential lack of assessment of the joint effects of gaseous pollutants, an inability to capture the migration of residents, and an inability to adjust for some potential confounders.
conclusionsExposure to wildfire-related PM2.5 can increase the risks of cancer mortality for many cancer sites, and the effect for wildfire-related PM2.5 was higher than for PM2.5 from non-wildfire sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.