Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36121844›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

Synaptic balancing: A biologically plausible local learning rule that provably increases neural network noise robustness without sacrificing task performance.

Christopher H Stock, Sarah E Harvey, Samuel A Ocko, Surya Ganguli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher H StockNeuroscience Graduate Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4579-660X
Sarah E HarveyDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2601-7487
Samuel A OckoDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3426-4517
Surya GanguliDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9264-7551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a novel, biologically plausible local learning rule that provably increases the robustness of neural dynamics to noise in nonlinear recurrent neural networks with homogeneous nonlinearities. Our learning rule achieves higher noise robustness without sacrificing performance on the task and without requiring any knowledge of the particular task. The plasticity dynamics-an integrable dynamical system operating on the weights of the network-maintains a multiplicity of conserved quantities, most notably the network's entire temporal map of input to output trajectories. The outcome of our learning rule is a synaptic balancing between the incoming and outgoing synapses of every neuron. This synaptic balancing rule is consistent with many known aspects of experimentally observed heterosynaptic plasticity, and moreover makes new experimentally testable predictions relating plasticity at the incoming and outgoing synapses of individual neurons. Overall, this work provides a novel, practical local learning rule that exactly preserves overall network function and, in doing so, provides new conceptual bridges between the disparate worlds of the neurobiology of heterosynaptic plasticity, the engineering of regularized noise-robust networks, and the mathematics of integrable Lax dynamical systems.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalTask Performance and AnalysisAction PotentialsLearningNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronal PlasticitySynapses

Identifiers

PMID36121844
PMCPMC9522011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.