Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36121759›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2022

A cross-species validation of single-beat metrics of cardiac contractility.

Mehdi Ahmadian, Alexandra M Williams, Joseph Mannozzi, Filip Konecny, Ryan L Hoiland, Liisa Wainman, Erin Erskine, Jennifer Duffy, Neda Manouchehri, Kitty So and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Mehdi AhmadianSchool of Kinesiology, Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Alexandra M WilliamsInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1571-9168
Joseph MannozziDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Filip KonecnyTransonic Scisense Inc., London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5930-8040
Ryan L HoilandInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Liisa WainmanInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Erin ErskineInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jennifer DuffyInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Neda ManouchehriInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kitty SoInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Keerit TauhInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Javier A Sala-MercadoDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Katelyn ShorttInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Shera FiskInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7560-7718
Kyoung-Tae KimInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4867-6854
Femke StreijgerInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Glen E FosterCentre for Heart, Lung, & Vascular Health, School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4110-9574
Brian K KwonInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Donal S O'LearyDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Christopher R WestInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0815-4122
University of British Columbia · CAWayne State University · USDiscovery Centre · CA

Funding

BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL DURING EXERCISE IN HEART FAILURER01HL055473 · NHLBI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI O'LEARY, DONAL S · 1996 to 2024
$9.8M
Mechanisms Mediating Enhanced Sympatho-Activation During Exercise in HypertensionR01HL126706 · NHLBI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI O'LEARY, DONAL S · 2016 to 2019
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-126706;HL-055473NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL055473NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of left ventricular (LV) contractility in animal models is useful in various experimental paradigms, yet obtaining such measures is inherently challenging and surgically invasive. In a cross-species study using small and large animals, we comprehensively tested the agreement and validity of multiple single-beat surrogate metrics of LV contractility against the field-standard metrics derived from inferior vena cava occlusion (IVCO). Fifty-six rats, 27 minipigs and 11 conscious dogs underwent LV and arterial catheterization and were assessed for a range of single-beat metrics of LV contractility. All single-beat metrics were tested for the various underlying assumptions required to be considered a valid metric of cardiac contractility, including load-independency, sensitivity to inotropic stimulation, and ability to diagnose contractile dysfunction in cardiac disease. Of all examined single-beat metrics, only LV maximal pressure normalized to end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic pressure normalized to EDV, and the maximal rate of rise of the LV pressure normalized to EDV showed a moderate-to-excellent agreement with their IVCO-derived reference measure and met all the underlying assumptions required to be considered as a valid cardiac contractile metric in both rodents and large-animal models. Our findings demonstrate that single-beat metrics can be used as a valid, reliable method to quantify cardiac contractile function in basic/preclinical experiments utilizing small- and large-animal models KEY POINTS: Validating and comparing indices of cardiac contractility that avoid caval occlusion would offer considerable advantages for the field of cardiovascular physiology. We comprehensively test the underlying assumptions of multiple single-beat indices of cardiac contractility in rodents and translate these findings to pigs and conscious dogs. We show that when performing caval occlusion is unfeasible, single-beat metrics can be utilized to accurately quantify cardiac inotropic function in basic and preclinical research employing various small and large animal species. We report that maximal left-ventricular (LV)-pressure normalized to end-diastolic volume (EDV), LV end-systolic pressure normalized to EDV and the maximal rate of rise of the LV pressure waveform normalized to EDV are the best three single-beat metrics to measure cardiac inotropic function in both small- and large-animal models.

Indexed as

Ventricular Function, LeftAnimalsDogsHeart VentriclesMyocardial ContractionRatsStroke VolumeSwineSwine, Miniatureanimal modelscardiac inotropysingle-beat assessment

Identifiers

PMID36121759
PMCPMC9669232
OpenAlexW4296293219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.