ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2023
The relationship between CT value and clinical outcomes in renal patients with COVID-19.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence, clinical features, and seasonal patterns of SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and HRSV in patients with a history of kidney transplantation in Iran.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Semi-quantitative software evaluation of COVID-19 CT examinations-correlation with clinical parameters.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Investigation of Initial Viral Loads and Patient Characteristics as Predictors of COVID-19 Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Infectious disease reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeConcomitant kidney diseases raise the mortality rate due to the SARS-CoV-2 virus as an independent factor. Although a qualitative PCR test's result is sufficient for diagnosis, Cycle threshold value may present relevant information to the physicians in providing faster treatment in patients with chronic conditions, including kidney diseases, to prevent morbidity and subsequent mortality. Thus, the present study was conducted to determine the relationship between the Cycle threshold value and clinical outcomes in renal patients with the coronavirus 2019.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted on renal patients with the coronavirus 2019 infection admitted to Labbafinejad Hospital in Tehran, the capital of Iran, within a period of one year, from late February 2020 to February 2021. Data were collected per the prepared checklist. Cycle threshold values were measured by performing PCR on nasopharynx and oropharynx swab samples of patients.
resultsAccording to the adjusted analysis, having high viral load increased the odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR = 11.65, 95% CI 3.93-34.54), ICU admission (aOR = 5.49, 95% CI 2.16-13.97), and invasive ventilation (aOR = 7.18, 95% CI 2.61-19.74). Having high viral load also increased the odds of O
conclusionCycle threshold value was a significant predictor of mortality in renal patients. Nevertheless, further studies are required on how to render optimal use of the Cycle threshold value, given that the quality of the test sample and the different groups of patients under study affect the effectiveness of this marker in predicting disease severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.