Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36121503›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Pediatric robotic surgery: issues in management-expert consensus from the Italian Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SARNePI) and the Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery (SICP).

Simonetta Tesoro, Piergiorgio Gamba, Mirko Bertozzi, Rachele Borgogni, Fabio Caramelli, Giovanni Cobellis, Giuseppe Cortese, Ciro Esposito, Tommaso Gargano, Rossella Garra and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Simonetta TesoroDivision of Anesthesia, Analgesia, and Intensive Care, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Piergiorgio GambaPediatric Surgery, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, 35128, Padua, Italy. piergiorgio.gamba@unipd.it.
Mirko BertozziDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, IRCCS San Matteo Polyclinic, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Rachele BorgogniPediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Fabio CaramelliAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Sant'Orsola Polyclinic, Bologna, Italy.
Giovanni CobellisPediatric Surgery Unit, Salesi Children's Hospital, Polytechnical University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Giuseppe CorteseDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Ciro EspositoPediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Tommaso GarganoPediatric Surgery Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Rossella GarraInstitute of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Giulia MantovaniPediatric Anesthesia, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy.
Laura MarchesiniDivision of Anesthesia, Analgesia, and Intensive Care, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Simonetta MencheriniAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS San Matteo Polyclinic, Pavia, Italy.
Mario MessinaDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Santa Maria Alle Scotte Polyclinic, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Gerald Rogan NebaDepartment of Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Salesi Children's Hospital, Ancona, Italy.
Gloria PelizzoPediatric Surgery Department, Vittore Buzzi' Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Simone PizziDepartment of Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Salesi Children's Hospital, Ancona, Italy.
Giovanna RiccipetitoniDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, IRCCS San Matteo Polyclinic, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Alessandro SimoniniDepartment of Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Salesi Children's Hospital, Ancona, Italy.
Costanza TognonPediatric Anesthesia, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy.
Mario LimaPediatric Surgery Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Fondazione Ospedale Salesi · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Padua · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale Santa Maria · ITPoliclinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITOspedale Santa Maria alle Scotte · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric robotic-assisted surgeries have increased in recent years; however, guidance documents are still lacking. This study aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations, or best practice statements when evidence is lacking or inadequate, to assist surgical teams internationally.

methodsA joint consensus taskforce of anesthesiologists and surgeons from the Italian Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SARNePI) and the Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery (SICP) have identified critical areas and reviewed the available evidence. The taskforce comprised 21 experts representing the fields of anesthesia (n = 11) and surgery (n = 10) from clinical centers performing pediatric robotic surgery in the Italian cities of Ancona, Bologna, Milan, Naples, Padua, Pavia, Perugia, Rome, Siena, and Verona. Between December 2020 and September 2021, three meetings, two Delphi rounds, and a final consensus conference took place.

resultsDuring the first planning meeting, the panel agreed on the specific objectives, the definitions to apply, and precise methodology. The project was structured into three subtopics: (i) preoperative patient assessment and preparation; (ii) intraoperative management (surgical and anesthesiologic); and (iii) postoperative procedures. Within these phases, the panel agreed to address a total of 18 relevant areas, which spanned preoperative patient assessment and patient selection, anesthesiology, critical care medicine, respiratory care, prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pain management.

conclusionCollaboration among surgeons and anesthesiologists will be increasingly important for achieving safe and effective RAS procedures. These recommendations will provide a review for those who already have relevant experience and should be particularly useful for those starting a new program.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnesthesiologyRobotic Surgical ProceduresChildConsensusCritical CareHumansInfant, NewbornAnesthesiologyConsensusPediatric minimally invasive surgeryPediatric robotically assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID36121503
PMCPMC9613560
OpenAlexW4296324569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.