Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36121461›Full record

ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2022

[What's new … Patients are listening-communication under general anesthesia].

Ernil Hansen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ernil HansenKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland. ernil.hansen@ukr.de.
University Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is ample evidence of awareness of at least some unconscious patients. A recent multicenter study found significant reductions after therapeutic communication during general anesthesia in postoperative pain and analgesic consumption, as well as in postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and antiemetic requirements in high-risk patients. Thus, an intraoperatively presentet text represents a simple non-pharmacological method to reduce side effects of surgery and anesthesia. This also offers treatment in other unconscious patients. However, another finding seems worth noting: the results of the study cannot be explained by the known intraoperative awareness and response of individual patients. Therefore, there should be a fundamental change in the way patients are treated in the operating room and intensive care unit, and background noise and careless conversations should be eliminated. 56 years after David Cheek formulated "BE CAREFUL, THE PATIENT IS LISTENING should be engraved over the door of every operating room, every recovery room, every intensive care unit in every hospital." after his first observations of patient perceptions, perhaps it is now time to finally heed this call and to use communication with unconscious patients that goes beyond the most necessary announcement of interventions and is therapeutically effective through positive suggestions. When in doubt, assume that the patient is listening.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsAnesthesia, GeneralCommunicationHumansPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPostoperative PainAntiemeticsAnesthesiaIntraoperative awarenessNon-pharmacologicalTherapeutic communicationUnconsciousness

Identifiers

PMID36121461
OpenAlexW4296324131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.