ArticleJournal of immunotherapy (Hagerstown, Md. : 1997)
First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Versus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor With Chemotherapy for Cisplatin-ineligible Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Evidence From a Real-world, Multicenter Analysis.
Article in Journal of immunotherapy (Hagerstown, Md. : 1997). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of liver metastasis on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2023Pooled it
- Combining serum inflammatory markers and clinical factors to predict survival in metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used for first-line cisplatin-ineligible patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, whether to use ICIs as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy is still uncertain. We retrospectively analyzed cisplatin-ineligible patients with mUC who underwent first-line ICI monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy at 2 medical centers in Taiwan from 2016 to 2021. We calculated the objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model for multivariable analysis. In total, 130 patients were enrolled and categorized into 2 groups: an ICI monotherapy group [immunotherapy (IO), n=101] and an ICI plus noncisplatin chemotherapy group [immunotherapy and chemotherapy (IC), n=29]. The median OS of patients in the IO and IC groups was 19.5 and 9.7 months ( P =0.33). Among patients with high programmed cell death ligand-1-expressing tumors, the median OS was significantly prolonged in the IO group compared with the IC group (not reached vs. 6.3 mo, P =0.02). First-line ICI monotherapy demonstrated robust antitumor activity in cisplatin-ineligible patients with mUC. Combining noncisplatin chemotherapy with ICI did not improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.