Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36121220›Full record

ReviewInfection and immunity2022

Sex and Gender Differences in Bacterial Infections.

Sara P Dias, Matthijs C Brouwer, Diederik van de Beek

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection and immunity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
27.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 191 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sex differences inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Sara P DiasDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0115-4840
Matthijs C BrouwerDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Diederik van de BeekDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4571-044X
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLUnidade Local de Saúde de São José · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing awareness of the importance of sex and gender in medicine and research. Women typically have stronger immune responses to self and foreign antigens than men, resulting in sex-based differences in autoimmunity and infectious diseases. In both animals and humans, males are generally more susceptible than females to bacterial infections. At the same time, gender differences in health-seeking behavior, quality of health care, and adherence to treatment recommendations have been reported. This review explores our current understanding of differences between males and females in bacterial diseases. We describe how genetic, immunological, hormonal, and anatomical factors interact to influence sex-based differences in pathophysiology, epidemiology, clinical presentation, disease severity, and prognosis, and how gender roles affect the behavior of patients and providers in the health care system.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsAnimalsDisease SusceptibilityFemaleHumansImmunityMaleSex CharacteristicsSex Factorsbacterial infectionsgender differencessex differences

Identifiers

PMID36121220
PMCPMC9584217
OpenAlexW4296325310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.