ReviewJournal of neuroscience research2022
Animal models of compression spinal cord injury.
Review in Journal of neuroscience research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tissue engineering for traumatic spinal cord injury: Research advances and clinical translation.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- The Immunologic Function of the Choroid Plexus: A Gateway to Immunomodulatory Therapy in Injury Models of the Central Nervous System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Animal models of spinal cord injury in neuro-urological research.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Hypoxia-Conditioned Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Extracellular Vesicles in a Spinal Cord Injury Rat Model.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Article
- Functional recovery after spinal cord injury through neuroprotection by lipoic acid-loaded hollow mesoporous Prussian blue nanozymes.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Removal or inhibition of transglutaminase 2 decreases cellular stress, supporting tissue preservation, and recovery after SCI.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
- Quercetin promotes angiogenesis and protects the blood-spinal cord barrier structure after spinal cord injury by targeting the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Loss of TRPV4 is insufficient to promote repair in a spinal cord injury contusion model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Animal Models of Spinal Cord Injury.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Spinal cord injury models: Advantages and disadvantages in the view of pathophysiology and clinical significance.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Review
- Delayed atorvastatin delivery promotes recovery after experimental spinal cord injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Article
- Sex and Strain-Specific Variations in Motor Recovery Following Compression Spinal Cord Injury: Comparison of Sprague-Dawley and Wistar Rats.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Effects of Teriparatide and Alendronate on Functional Recovery from Spinal Cord Injury and Postinjury Bone Loss.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Spinal cord injury modeling: from modeling to evaluation using rats as examples.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- TLR3 Knockdown Attenuates Pressure-Induced Neuronal Damage In Vitro.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Development of a chronic compression spinal cord injury model in neonatal and adult rats.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Sexual Dimorphism of Spinal Neural Circuits Controlling the Mouse External Urethral Sphincter With and Without Spinal Cord Injury.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2024Article
- Characterizing the Impact of Compression Duration and Deformation-Related Loss of Closure Force on Clip-Induced Spinal Cord Injury in Rats.Neurology international · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compression spinal cord injuries are a common cause of morbidity in people who experience a spinal cord injury (SCI). Either as a by-product of a traumatic injury or due to nontraumatic conditions such as cervical myelitis, compression injuries are growing in prevalence clinically and many attempts of animal replication have been described within the literature. These models, however, often focus on the traumatic side of injury or mimic short-term injuries that are not representative of the majority of compression SCI. Of this, nontraumatic spinal cord injuries are severely understudied and have an increased prevalence in elderly populations, adults, and children. Therefore, there is a need to critically evaluate the current animal models of compression SCI and their suitability as a method for clinically relevant data that can help reduce morbidity and mortality of SCI. In this review, we reviewed the established and emerging methods of animal models of compression SCI. These models are the clip, balloon, solid spacer, expanding polymer, remote, weight drop, calibrated forceps, screw, and strap methods. These methods showed that there is a large reliance on the use of laminectomy to induce injury. Furthermore, the age range of many studies does not reflect the elderly and young populations that commonly suffer from compression injuries. It is therefore important to have techniques and methods that are able to minimize secondary effects of the surgeries, and are representative of the clinical cases seen so that treatments and interventions can be developed that are specific.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.