Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36120826›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2022

Application of CT-MRI Fusion-Based Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Technique in the Anatomic Study of Posterior Cruciate Ligament.

Keyi Feng, Tianyue Wang, Jin Tang, Xiaorui Hao, Xiaojun Ma, Zhenan Qu, Weiming Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keyi FengDepartment of Bone and Joint Surgery, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Tianyue WangDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Jin TangDepartment of Bone and Joint Surgery, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Xiaorui HaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nanping First Hospital affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Nanping, China.
Xiaojun MaDepartment of Sports Medicine, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Zhenan QuDepartment of Sports Medicine, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Weiming WangDeportment of Sports Medicine, Affiliated Xinhua Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3511-3369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDuring PCL reconstruction surgery, precise and personalized positioning of the graft tunnel is very important. In order to obtain patient-specific anatomical data, we established a three-dimensional knee joint fusion model to provide a unified imaging strategy, as well as anatomical information, for individualized and accurate posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction.

methodsThis is an exploration study. From January 2019 to January 2020, 20 healthy adults randomly were enrolled and assessed via CT and MRI imaging. A three-dimensional fusion model of the knee joint was generated using the modified MIMIMICS and image fusion software. On the fused image, the areas of the femoral and tibial PCL footprint of both knees were measured. The anatomical center of the PCL footprint was measured at the femoral and tibial ends. The relevant bony landmarks surrounding the PCL femoral and tibial attachment were also measured. Paired t-tests were employed for all statistical analyzes, and p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

resultsAll 20 subjects achieved successful image fusion modeling and measurement, with an average duration of 12 h. The lengths of the LF1-LF3 were 32.1 ± 1.8, 6.8 ± 2.5, and 23.3 ± 2.1 mm, respectively. The lengths of the LT1-LT3 were 37.3 ± 3.3, 45.6 ± 5.3, and 6.0 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. The distances between the tibial PCL center of the left knee to the medial groove, champagne-glass drop-off, and the apex of the medial intercondylar were 8.4 ± 2.4, 9.2 ± 1.8, and 15.3 ± 1.4 mm, respectively, and the corresponding distances from the right knee were 8.0 ± 2.0, 9.4 ± 2.2, and 16.1 ± 1.8 mm, respectively. We observed no difference between the bilateral sides, in terms of the distance from the PCL center to the PCL attachment-related landmark, under arthroscopic guidance. The area of the femoral and tibial PCL footprints on the left knee were 115.3 ± 33.5 and 146.6 ± 24.4 mm

conclusionIn the fusion image, the PCL attachment center and relevant bony landmarks which can be easily identified under arthroscopy can be accurately measured. The model can also obtain personalized anatomical data of the PCL on the unaffected side of the patient, which can guide clinical PCL reconstruction.

Indexed as

Posterior Cruciate LigamentAdultFemurHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingTibiaTomography, X-Ray Computedbony landmarksCT-MRI fusion modelfootprint areaposterior cruciate ligamentthree-dimensional reconstruction technique

Identifiers

PMID36120826
PMCPMC9627086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.