Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36120825›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2022

Finite-Element Analysis of a Novel Cephalomedullary Nail for Restricted Sliding to Reduce Risk of Implant Failure in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Shaobo Nie, Jiantao Li, Ming Li, Ming Hao, Kun Wang, Ying Xiong, Xuewen Gan, Licheng Zhang, Peifu Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of the Dynamic Cut-Out Failure Modes of Common Proximal Femoral Fixation Devices Using a Mesh-Free Computational Method.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shaobo Nie *Department of Orthopedics, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiantao Li *Department of Orthopedics, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ming Li *Department of Orthopedics, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ming HaoDepartment of Orthopedics, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Kun WangDepartment of Orthopedics, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ying XiongDepartment of orthopedics, Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Xuewen GanDepartment of orthopedics, Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Licheng ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6782-1749
Peifu TangDepartment of Orthopedics, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4279-1704
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNKunming Medical University · CN

Funding

Special Research Project of Prevention and Treatment of Military Training Injuries 20XLS27
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHow to restrict sliding of cephalomedullary nail and rigid reconstruct medial support for unstable intertrochanteric fractures remains a challenge. This study aims to explore the feasibility of a novel cephalomedullary nail for restriction sliding and reconstruction of medial femoral support to prevent failure in unstable trochanteric fractures through finite element analysis.

methodsThe DICOM files of a unilateral femur spiral computed tomography (CT) scans from a elderly female were converted into STL files, and the most common clinical trochanteric fracture model with the absence of medial support, AO/OTA 31-A2.3 was simulated by removing the posterior medial femur. The model of a novel medial sustain nail (MSN-II) and a widely used nail (proximal femoral nail anti-rotation PFNA-II) were modeled according to the manufacturer-provided engineering drawing. Different loads were applied to the femoral head to simulate the postoperative weight bearing gait. The sliding distance of helical blade in femoral neck, maximum stress of femur and nail, displacement of proximal fragment were analyzed to revealing the mechanical stability of unstable trochanteric fracture stabilized by different implant.

resultsThe sliding distance of helical blade in the femoral neck, the maximum stress on the femur and nail, the displacement of proximal fragment in MSN-II under 2100N axial load were 0.65 mm, 689 MPa, 1271 MPa, 16.84 mm respectively, while that were 1.43 mm, 720.8 MPa, 1444 MPa, 18.18 mm, respectively in PFNA-II. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05) and the stress was mainly distributed in medial distal side of nail but helical blade and the proximal aperture for the nail in MSN-II. Compared to PFNA-II, MSN-II demonstrates biomechanical merit against femur medialization, cut-out and coax varus.

conclusionThe sliding distance of helical blade in femoral neck, the maximum stress on the femur and nail, and the displacement of proximal fragment of MSN-II were less than those of PFNA-II in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Therefore MSN-II has better stability than PFNA-II and it may have the potential to avoid femur medialization and cut out. It might be an option in unstable trochanteric fracture because of its superiority in restricted sliding and medial support reconstruction.

Indexed as

Bone NailsHip FracturesAgedFemaleFemurFemur HeadFinite Element AnalysisHumansFinite element analysisMedial supportProximal femoral nail anti-rotationSlidingUnstable trochanteric fracture

Identifiers

PMID36120825
PMCPMC9627085
OpenAlexW4296322246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.