ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2022
High Soluble Amyloid-β42 Predicts Normal Cognition in Amyloid-Positive Individuals with Alzheimer's Disease-Causing Mutations.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dementia blood biomarkers in the context of post-stroke cognitive outcomes: Systematic review and evidence synthesis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Pooled it
- Critical assessment of anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibodies effects in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting target engagement and clinical meaningfulness.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- The TyrRS cascade: circadian gating of neuronal DNA repair and its collapse in aging.GeroScience · 2026Review
- Article
- Network-Level Characterization of Spontaneous Calcium Activity in an In-Vitro Alzheimer's Disease Model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Restoring amyloid-β42 and γ-secretase function in Alzheimer's disease.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Physics of Protein Aggregation in Normal and Accelerated Brain Aging.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Transcriptomic alterations in APP/PS1 mice astrocytes lead to early postnatal axon initial segment structural changes.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Article
- Novel Therapeutic Strategies in Alzheimer's Disease: Pitfalls and Challenges of Anti-Amyloid Therapies and Beyond.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Early- and Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease: Two Sides of the Same Coin?Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Alzheimer's disease: a review on the current trends of the effective diagnosis and therapeutics.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Review
- Anti-Amyloid Therapies for Alzheimer's Disease and the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Proteome wide association studies of LRRK2 variants identify novel causal and druggable proteins for Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2023Article
- Characteristics and Predictors of Alzheimer's Disease Resilience Phenotype.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- How Can Static and Oscillating Electric Fields Serve in Decomposing Alzheimer's and Other Senile Plaques?Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023Article
- Calmodulin and Amyloid Beta as Coregulators of Critical Events during the Onset and Progression of Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Exposure to World Trade Center Dust Exacerbates Cognitive Impairment and Evokes a Central and Peripheral Pro-Inflammatory Transcriptional Profile in an Animal Model of Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2023Article
- Re-Addressing Dementia by Network Medicine and Mechanism-Based Molecular Endotypes.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn amyloid-positive individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD), high soluble 42-amino acid amyloid-β (Aβ42) levels are associated with normal cognition. It is unknown if this relationship applies longitudinally in a genetic cohort.
objectiveTo test the hypothesis that high Aβ42 preserves normal cognition in amyloid-positive individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD)-causing mutations (APP, PSEN1, or PSEN2) to a greater extent than lower levels of brain amyloid, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) phosphorylated tau (p-tau), or total tau (t-tau).
methodsCognitive progression was defined as any increase in Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR = 0, normal cognition; 0.5, very mild dementia; 1, mild dementia) over 3 years. Amyloid-positivity was defined as a standard uptake value ratio (SUVR) ≥1.42 by Pittsburgh compound-B positron emission tomography (PiB-PET). We used modified Poisson regression models to estimate relative risk (RR), adjusted for age at onset, sex, education, APOE4 status, and duration of follow-up. The results were confirmed with multiple sensitivity analyses, including Cox regression.
resultsOf 232 mutation carriers, 108 were PiB-PET-positive at baseline, with 43 (39.8%) meeting criteria for progression after 3.3±2.0 years. Soluble Aβ42 levels were higher among CDR non-progressors than CDR progressors. Higher Aβ42 predicted a lower risk of progression (adjusted RR, 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.67; p = 0.002) better than lower SUVR (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96; p = 0.018). CSF Aβ42 levels predicting lower risk of progression increased with higher SUVR levels.
conclusionHigh CSF Aβ42 levels predict normal cognition in amyloid-positive individuals with AD-causing genetic mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.