Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36120781›Full record

Trial reportJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2022

Comparison of Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Donepezil Transdermal Delivery System with Oral Donepezil.

Pierre N Tariot, Rene Braeckman, Charles Oh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04617782 (A Phase 1, Open-Label, 3-Period, Randomized, Crossover Pharmacokinetic Study to Evaluate the Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of 5 mg and 10 mg Corplex™ Donepezil TDS Compared to 10 mg Oral Aricept® in Healthy Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04617782 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1, Open-Label, 3-Period, Randomized, Crossover Pharmacokinetic Study to Evaluate the Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of 5 mg and 10 mg Corplex™ Donepezil TDS Compared to 10 mg Oral Aricept® in Healthy Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorCorium, Inc.Ran2020 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsHealthy SubjectsArmsDonepezil TDS, Aricept
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Topical Donepezil for Cholinergic Modulation in Chronic Wound Repair.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre N TariotBanner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Rene BraeckmanKemPharm, Inc., Celebration, FL, USA.
Charles OhCorium Inc., Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Banner Alzheimer’s InstituteCorium (United States) · USKemPharm (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDonepezil is approved for treatment of dementia of the Alzheimer type and is currently available only in tablet forms in the United States.

objectiveTo compare steady-state pharmacokinetics of once-weekly 10-mg/d and 5-mg/d Corplex™ donepezil transdermal delivery systems (TDS) with once-daily 10-mg oral donepezil.

methodsOpen-label, randomized, crossover study (NCT04617782) enrolled healthy participants aged 18-55 years. All participants received 5-mg/d donepezil TDS during the 5-week Period 1, followed by 10-mg/d TDS or 10-mg/d oral donepezil in the 5-week Period 2; treatments were switched in Period 3. Bioequivalence was assessed at steady state on Week 5.

resultsAll 60 enrolled participants received 5-mg/d TDS, 55 received 10-mg/d TDS, and 56 received oral donepezil. Adjusted geometric mean ratio (% [90% CI]) for maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (0-168 h) were 88.7 (81.7-96.2) and 108.6 (100.5-117.4) for 10-mg/d and 86.1 (79.8-92.9) and 105.3 (97.6-113.6) for dose-normalized 5-mg/d TDS and were generally within the 80% -125% range for establishing bioequivalence with oral donepezil. Skin adhesion was similar for both TDSs (>80% of patches remaining ≥75% adhered throughout the wear period). Overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar across treatments. Compared with 10-mg/d TDS, oral donepezil was associated with higher incidence of gastrointestinal and nervous system AEs (14.5% versus 53.6% and 14.5% versus 30.4%, respectively).

conclusionDonepezil TDSs are bioequivalent to oral donepezil at steady state and have a safety profile that supports their use in treating dementia of the Alzheimer type.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDonepezilAdolescentAdultCross-Over StudiesHumansMiddle AgedYoung AdultDonepezilAlzheimer’s diseaseAlzheimer type dementiabioequivalencedonepeziltransdermal patch

Identifiers

PMID36120781
PMCPMC9661317
OpenAlexW4296326377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.