Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36120780›Full record

SynthesisJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2022

Digital Technologies to Prevent Social Isolation and Loneliness in Dementia: A Systematic Review.

Harleen Kaur Rai, David Kernaghan, Linda Schoonmade, Kieren J Egan, Anne Margriet Pot

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Detecting the Impact of Older Adult Healthy Brain Aging Behaviour Adoption Using Smart Home Technology.Proceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Harleen Kaur RaiDigital Health and Wellness Research Group (DHaWG), Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, UK.
David KernaghanDigital Health and Wellness Research Group (DHaWG), Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, UK.
Linda SchoonmadeMedical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kieren J EganDigital Health and Wellness Research Group (DHaWG), Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, UK.
Anne Margriet PotErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia poses significant and sustained challenges to global society. Diagnosis can lead to increased feelings of loneliness and social isolation. People with dementia living alone are particularly at risk. Considering the growing number of technologies proposed to aid people with dementia address social isolation and loneliness, we reviewed the existing literature.

objectiveTo collate and summarize current evidence for digital technologies to prevent social isolation and loneliness for people with dementia.

methodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched five databases to identify studies of digital technologies designed to support or prevent social isolation or loneliness for people with dementia. Pre-specified outcomes included social isolation, loneliness, and quality of life. We used deductive thematic analysis to synthesize the major themes emerging from the studies.

resultsTen studies met our inclusion criteria where all studies reported improvements in quality of life and seven reported benefits regarding social inclusion or a reduction in loneliness. Technologies were varied across purpose, delivery format, theoretical models, and levels of personalization. Two studies clearly described the involvement of people with dementia in the study design and five technologies were available outside the research context.

conclusionThere is limited- but increasing- evidence that technologies hold potential to improve quality of life and reduce isolation/loneliness for people with dementia. Results presented are largely based in small-scale research studies. Involvement of people with dementia was limited and few research concepts are reaching implementation. Closer collaboration with people with dementia to provide affordable, inclusive, and person-centered solutions is urgently required.

Indexed as

DementiaLonelinessDigital TechnologyHumansQuality of LifeSocial IsolationDementiadigital technologylonelinessquality of lifesocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID36120780
PMCPMC9697035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.