ArticleFrontiers in digital health2022
Understanding users' perspectives on mobile apps for anxiety management.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of a Prescription-Based Mobile Digital Therapeutic as an Adjunct to Pharmacotherapy for the Acute Phase of Panic Disorder: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Safety and Efficacy of Modular Digital Psychotherapy for Social Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Integration of Ecological Momentary Assessment and Intervention With Wearable-Based Digital Phenotypes to Treat Anxiety in Young Adults: Mixed Methods Experimental Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Value in app store metadata and user reviews: A dual perspective on quality of Parkinson's and dementia apps.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Towards Human-Centered Digital Health Interventions.The Psychiatric clinics of North America · 2026Review
- Digital health technologies for adults with ADHD: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Piloting Digital Navigators to Promote Acceptance and Engagement With Digital Mental Health Apps in German Outpatient Care: Protocol for a Multicenter, Single-Group, Observational, Mixed Methods Interventional Study (DigiNavi).JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Health Care Workers' Experience With a Psychological Self-Monitoring App During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Article
- Engagement and attrition in digital mental health: current challenges and potential solutions.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Diaphragmatic Breathing Interfaces to Promote Relaxation for Mitigating Insomnia: Pilot Study.JMIR serious games · 2025Article
- Digital Interventions for the Rehabilitation of First-Episode Psychosis: An Integrated Perspective.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- A mobile intervention to reduce anxiety among university students, faculty, and staff: Mixed methods study on users' experiences.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Digital wellness or digital dependency? a critical examination of mental health apps and their implications.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Assessing Digital Phenotyping for App Recommendations and Sustained Engagement: Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- RegulEm, an unified protocol based-app for the treatment of emotional disorders: a parallel mixed methods usability and quality study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Exploring perceptions of psychology students in Delhi-NCR Region towards using mental health apps to promote resilience: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Suicide.ca, Quebec's Digital Suicide Prevention Strategy Platform: Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- User-centric AI: evaluating the usability of generative AI applications through user reviews on app stores.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Smartphone-based serious games for mental health: a scoping review.Multimedia tools and applications · 2024Article
- Digital transformation of mental health services.Npj mental health research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anxiety disorders are the most common type of mental health problem. The potential of apps to improve mental health has led to an increase in the number of anxiety apps available. Even though anxiety apps hold the potential to enhance mental health care for individuals, there is relatively little knowledge concerning users' perspectives. This mixed-methods study aims to understand the nature of user burden and engagement with mental health apps (MHapps) targeting anxiety management, in order to identify ways to improve the design of these apps. Users' perspectives on these apps were gathered by analyzing 600 reviews from 5 apps on the app stores (Study 1), and conducting 15 interviews with app users (Study 2). The results shed light on several barriers to adoption and sustained use. Users appreciate apps that offer content variation, customizability, and good interface design, and often requested an enhanced, personalized experience to improve engagement. We propose addressing the specific app quality issues identified through human-centered design, more personalized content delivery, and by improving features for social and therapeutic support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.