Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36120698›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

MRI-Based Medical Image Recognition: Identification and Diagnosis of LDH.

Shuai Wang, Zhengwei Jiang, Hualin Yang, Xiangrong Li, Zhicheng Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuai WangCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2892-1085
Zhengwei JiangCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2270-1823
Hualin YangCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4179-8963
Xiangrong LiCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9085-2447
Zhicheng YangDepartment of Radiology, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0663-3832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To realize the automatic symptom recognition and classification of MR images and improve the accuracy and efficiency of the diagnosis of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (LDH), a method for lumbar intervertebral disc recognition and disease classification is proposed in this paper. The method mainly includes three steps: preprocessing, target segmentation, and symptom classification. Preprocessing is performed by noise reduction and interference removal methods for blurred images. The contour poles are used to determine the four points of the tail vertebra in order to reduce the wrong segmentation of the tail vertebra. A classification method based on five judgment indicators is proposed, which effectively improves the stability of disease diagnosis. The example verifies that the algorithm can accurately complete the target segmentation and the accuracy of symptom classification reaches the standard of professional doctors, which proves that the method has good robustness.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithms

Identifiers

PMID36120698
PMCPMC9481307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.