Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36120476›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics

Pre-operative planning and templating with 3-D printed models for complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.

Venkateshwar Reddy Maryada, Praharsha Mulpur, Krishna Kiran Eachempati, Adarsh Annapareddy, Vemaganti Badri Narayana Prasad, A V Gurava Reddy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Venkateshwar Reddy MaryadaSunshine Bone and Joint Institute, Sunshine Hospital, Penderghast Road, PG Road, Opposite Parsi Dharamsala, Paradise, Secunderabad, 500003, Telangana, India.
Praharsha MulpurSunshine Bone and Joint Institute, Sunshine Hospital, Penderghast Road, PG Road, Opposite Parsi Dharamsala, Paradise, Secunderabad, 500003, Telangana, India.
Krishna Kiran EachempatiMedicover Hospitals, Madhapur, Hyderabad, India.
Adarsh AnnapareddySunshine Bone and Joint Institute, Sunshine Hospital, Penderghast Road, PG Road, Opposite Parsi Dharamsala, Paradise, Secunderabad, 500003, Telangana, India.
Vemaganti Badri Narayana PrasadSunshine Bone and Joint Institute, Sunshine Hospital, Penderghast Road, PG Road, Opposite Parsi Dharamsala, Paradise, Secunderabad, 500003, Telangana, India.
A V Gurava ReddySunshine Bone and Joint Institute, Sunshine Hospital, Penderghast Road, PG Road, Opposite Parsi Dharamsala, Paradise, Secunderabad, 500003, Telangana, India.
Sunshine Hospitals · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Complex primary and revision THR requires comprehensive understanding of abnormal bony anatomy. Evaluation and classification of acetabular bone defects is essential to manage them appropriately. It is difficult to appreciate complex defects using conventional 2-Dimensional radiological modalities. 3D printed models can provide both visual and tactile reproduction of the bony anatomy, with potential for better pre-operative planning and making these complex surgeries more precise and accurate. Materials and methods: Anatomical 3D models of pelvis and femur were made based on CT scans of 27 patients undergoing complex primary THR/Revision THR by FDM (Fusion Deposition Modeling) technology using Flash Forge-Dreamer 3D printer with ABS (plastic) material. Models were used for pre-operative planning and simulation of surgery. Aims of the study were to study the accuracy of 3D models in predicting the implant sizes, accuracy in evaluation of acetabular bone defects and validating the utility of 3 D models through surgeon feedback. Results: The acetabular cup size and placement was accurate in 25 (92.6%) patients. Preoperative acetabular bone defect was accurately estimated in all the patients. There were no neurovascular complications at early and 1-year follow-up in this case series. Model realism and reliability survey response from five surgeons was graded, with average overall usefulness of 3D models of 4.86/5, average model realism was 4.9/5, average usefulness for planning was 4.74/5 and usefulness for teaching was 5/5. Conclusion: 3D models are accurate and help in assessing acetabular bone deficiencies reliably in complex and revision THR. Anatomical models help in surgical planning and simulation, enabling surgeons in predicting the correct implant sizes and importantly placement of acetabular cup and for management of bone defects. The safe trajectory of acetabular screws can be simulated and determined, thereby avoiding penetration into pelvis and neuro-vascular injuries.

Indexed as

3D-printingBone defectsPlanningPre-operative evaluationRevision arthroplastyTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID36120476
PMCPMC9478492
OpenAlexW4295528078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.