ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Pre-operative planning and templating with 3-D printed models for complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Application of FDM 3D Printing in Surgery and Traumatology: A Systematic Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Pooled it
- Comparing functional outcomes between 3D printed acetabular cups and traditional prosthetic implants in hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta analysis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Robotic-specific patient education reduces preoperative anxiety and improves outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- A three-dimensional digital study on clinical anatomy of the acetabulum in elderly population aged 65-84 years in inner Mongolia, China.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Hands-on Total Hip Arthroplasty Simulation After Surgically Treated Acetabular Fractures: A Technical Note on 8 Cases.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- AI-driven 3D virtual surgical planning in total hip arthroplasty: a machine learning approach for precision implant positioning and improved clinical outcomes.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Time- and cost-effective manufacturing of 3D templates of the pelvis and acetabulum in primary and revision hip arthroplasty using semiautomatic segmentation.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Specialized educational program for high-grade liver injury management: a three-dimensional printed model approach.Surgery today · 2025Article
- Custom-made implants for massive acetabular bone loss: accuracy with CT assessment.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Accuracy of Personalized Computed Tomographic 3D Templating for Acetabular Cup Placement in Revision Arthroplasty.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Comparison of the Accuracy of 2D and 3D Templating for Revision Total Hip Replacement.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Complex primary and revision THR requires comprehensive understanding of abnormal bony anatomy. Evaluation and classification of acetabular bone defects is essential to manage them appropriately. It is difficult to appreciate complex defects using conventional 2-Dimensional radiological modalities. 3D printed models can provide both visual and tactile reproduction of the bony anatomy, with potential for better pre-operative planning and making these complex surgeries more precise and accurate. Materials and methods: Anatomical 3D models of pelvis and femur were made based on CT scans of 27 patients undergoing complex primary THR/Revision THR by FDM (Fusion Deposition Modeling) technology using Flash Forge-Dreamer 3D printer with ABS (plastic) material. Models were used for pre-operative planning and simulation of surgery. Aims of the study were to study the accuracy of 3D models in predicting the implant sizes, accuracy in evaluation of acetabular bone defects and validating the utility of 3 D models through surgeon feedback. Results: The acetabular cup size and placement was accurate in 25 (92.6%) patients. Preoperative acetabular bone defect was accurately estimated in all the patients. There were no neurovascular complications at early and 1-year follow-up in this case series. Model realism and reliability survey response from five surgeons was graded, with average overall usefulness of 3D models of 4.86/5, average model realism was 4.9/5, average usefulness for planning was 4.74/5 and usefulness for teaching was 5/5. Conclusion: 3D models are accurate and help in assessing acetabular bone deficiencies reliably in complex and revision THR. Anatomical models help in surgical planning and simulation, enabling surgeons in predicting the correct implant sizes and importantly placement of acetabular cup and for management of bone defects. The safe trajectory of acetabular screws can be simulated and determined, thereby avoiding penetration into pelvis and neuro-vascular injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.