SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2022
Supersonic shear wave imaging of the tibial nerve for diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Screening Tests for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: An Umbrella Review.Journal of diabetes research · 2024Review
- Predictive value of ultrasonography in polyneuropathy diagnosis: electrophysiological and ultrasonographic analysis.Rheumatology international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is the most common diabetes-associated complication and imposes a significant burden to healthcare systems. Thus, early diagnosis of DPN is extremely critical for management and outcome of diabetic patients. Supersonic Shear Wave Imaging (SSI) enables the noninvasive measurement of nerve stiffness. However, previous studies on SSI in the diagnosis of DPN were limited in sample sizes and reported various results. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to obtain comprehensive evidence on the value of tibial nerve stiffness measurement by SSI in the diagnosis of DPN. Methods: A comprehensive literature search in English and Chinese electronic database was conducted for studies (published until January 25, 2022) that investigated the diagnostic performance of tibial nerve stiffness measurement by SSI for detecting DPN. Summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) modelling was constructed to conduct the meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of SSI for detecting DPN. Results: Finally, a total of 12 eligible studies with 1325 subjects were included for evaluation, and a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of tibial nerve stiffness measurement by SSI for detecting DPN. For tibial nerve stiffness measurement by SSI, the summary sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of DPN were 80% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73%-86%) and 86% (95% CI: 82%-89%), respectively. The summary area under the ROC curve (AUROC) value of the SROC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92), for diagnosing DPN. A subgroup analysis of 11 SSI studies from China revealed similar diagnostic performance, with a summary sensitivity of 79% (95% CI: 72%-85%), specificity of 86% (95% CI: 82%-89%) and summary AUROC value of the SROC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92) for diagnosing DPN. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests that a tibial nerve stiffness measurement by SSI shows good performance in diagnosing DPN and has considerable potential as a noninvasive tool for detecting DPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.