Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36120451›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Bacterial isolates from diabetic foot ulcers and their antimicrobial resistance profile from selected hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Asegdew Atlaw, Habtamu Biazin Kebede, Abdurezak Ahmed Abdela, Yimtubezinash Woldeamanuel

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Risk Factors Associated With Methicillin-ResistantThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Diabetes-related lower limb wounds: Antibiotic susceptibility pattern and biofilm formation.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Asegdew AtlawDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Habtamu Biazin KebedeDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abdurezak Ahmed AbdelaDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Yimtubezinash WoldeamanuelDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Addis Ababa University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Infected diabetic foot ulcer (IDFU) is a worldwide problem associated with diabetes mellitus. It could lead from soft tissue infection to bone infection and is a leading cause of lower limb amputation. Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, including anaerobic bacteria and fungi, are considered potential causes of infection. The early diagnosis of DFU infection and appropriate treatment based on the identification of the pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern is important for good prognosis. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to isolate the bacteria that infect foot ulcers in selected Hospitals and determine their antimicrobial resistance profile. Method: An institutional-based multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in selected Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from November 2020 to May 2021. A sterile swab was used to collect samples from the foot ulcer and a sterile needle to collect pus. Isolates were identified by culture, Gram-staining, and a series of biochemical tests. For each bacterial species identified, the antibiotic profiling was determined by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Results: one hundred and twenty-seven pathogenic bacteria were isolated from samples taken from 130 patients with a diabetic foot ulcer. Sixty-eight percent had growth of multiple microorganisms. Two-thirds (66.7%) of the isolates were gram-negative bacteria. The predominant bacterial species were Conclusion: The majority of bacteria isolated from patients presenting with Diabetic foot ulcer infections were found to be multi-drug resistant in the study sites of the current study. The results demonstrate the importance of timely identification of infection of diabetic foot ulcers, proper sample collection for identification of the pathogens and for determining their antibiotic susceptibility pattern before initiating antimicrobial treatment.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAztreonamBacteriaChloramphenicolClindamycinCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialEthiopiaHospitalsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcus aureusAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAztreonamChloramphenicolClindamycinaddis Ababaantimicrobial susceptibility testingdiabetic foot ulcerdiabetic Mellitusethiopiamultidrug resistance

Identifiers

PMID36120451
PMCPMC9472130
OpenAlexW4293741203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.