ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics2022
Sharing Time-to-Event Data with Privacy Protection.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Collaborative Inference for Accelerated Failure Time Model Using Clinical Center-Level Summary Statistics.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Private Continuous Survival Analysis with Distributed Multi-Site Data.Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data · 2023Article
- Mitigating Membership Inference in Deep Survival Analyses with Differential Privacy.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sharing time-to-event data is beneficial for enabling collaborative research efforts (e.g., survival studies), facilitating the design of effective interventions, and advancing patient care (e.g., early diagnosis). Despite numerous privacy solutions for sharing time-to-event data, recent research studies have shown that external information may become available (e.g., self-disclosure of study participation on social media) to an adversary, posing new privacy concerns. In this work, we formulate a cohort inference attack for time-to-event data sharing, in which an informed adversary aims at inferring the membership of a target individual in a specific cohort. Our study investigates the privacy risks associated with time-to-event data and evaluates the empirical privacy protection offered by popular privacy-protecting solutions (e.g., binning, differential privacy). Furthermore, we propose a novel approach to privately release individual level time-to-event data with high utility, while providing indistinguishability guarantees for the input value. Our method TE-Sanitizer is shown to provide effective mitigation against the inference attacks and high usefulness in survival analysis. The results and discussion provide domain experts with insights on the privacy and the usefulness of the studied methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.