Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36120417›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics2022

Sharing Time-to-Event Data with Privacy Protection.

Luca Bonomi, Liyue Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Private Continuous Survival Analysis with Distributed Multi-Site Data.Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data · 2023
    Article
  3. Mitigating Membership Inference in Deep Survival Analyses with Differential Privacy.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luca BonomiDept. of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Liyue FanDept. of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC.

Funding

SAFEGENOMES: Strong privacy Assurance For Effective GENOME SharingR00HG010493 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BONOMI, LUCA · 2022 to 2024
$744k
NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG010493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sharing time-to-event data is beneficial for enabling collaborative research efforts (e.g., survival studies), facilitating the design of effective interventions, and advancing patient care (e.g., early diagnosis). Despite numerous privacy solutions for sharing time-to-event data, recent research studies have shown that external information may become available (e.g., self-disclosure of study participation on social media) to an adversary, posing new privacy concerns. In this work, we formulate a cohort inference attack for time-to-event data sharing, in which an informed adversary aims at inferring the membership of a target individual in a specific cohort. Our study investigates the privacy risks associated with time-to-event data and evaluates the empirical privacy protection offered by popular privacy-protecting solutions (e.g., binning, differential privacy). Furthermore, we propose a novel approach to privately release individual level time-to-event data with high utility, while providing indistinguishability guarantees for the input value. Our method TE-Sanitizer is shown to provide effective mitigation against the inference attacks and high usefulness in survival analysis. The results and discussion provide domain experts with insights on the privacy and the usefulness of the studied methods.

Indexed as

Provable PrivacySurvival AnalysisTime-to-event Data

Identifiers

PMID36120417
PMCPMC9473343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.