Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36120336›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Integrated bioinformatical analysis, machine learning and

Chunxiang Feng, Zhixian Wang, Chang Liu, Shiliang Liu, Yuxi Wang, Yuanyuan Zeng, Qianqian Wang, Tianming Peng, Xiaoyong Pu, Jiumin Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Chunxiang FengDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Guangzhou, Wuhan, China.
Zhixian WangDepartment of Urology, Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Chang LiuDepartment of Geriatrics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Shiliang LiuDepartment of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yuxi WangDepartment of Nephrology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yuanyuan ZengSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China.
Qianqian WangDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Guangzhou, Wuhan, China.
Tianming PengDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Guangzhou, Wuhan, China.
Xiaoyong PuDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Guangzhou, Wuhan, China.
Jiumin LiuDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Guangzhou, Wuhan, China.
Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNSouthwest Jiaotong University · CNTongji Hospital · CNWuhan No.1 Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal biopsy is the gold standard for defining renal fibrosis which causes calcium deposits in the kidneys. Persistent calcium deposition leads to kidney inflammation, cell necrosis, and is related to serious kidney diseases. However, it is invasive and involves the risk of complications such as bleeding, especially in patients with end-stage renal diseases. Therefore, it is necessary to identify specific diagnostic biomarkers for renal fibrosis. This study aimed to develop a predictive drug target signature to diagnose renal fibrosis based on m6A subtypes. We then performed an unsupervised consensus clustering analysis to identify three different m6A subtypes of renal fibrosis based on the expressions of 21 m6A regulators. We evaluated the immune infiltration characteristics and expression of canonical immune checkpoints and immune-related genes with distinct m6A modification patterns. Subsequently, we performed the WGCNA analysis using the expression data of 1,611 drug targets to identify 474 genes associated with the m6A modification. 92 overlapping drug targets between WGCNA and DEGs (renal fibrosis vs. normal samples) were defined as key drug targets. A five target gene predictive model was developed through the combination of LASSO regression and stepwise logistic regression (LASSO-SLR) to diagnose renal fibrosis. We further performed drug sensitivity analysis and extracellular matrix analysis on model genes. The ROC curve showed that the risk score (AUC = 0.863) performed well in diagnosing renal fibrosis in the training dataset. In addition, the external validation dataset further confirmed the outstanding predictive performance of the risk score (AUC = 0.755). These results indicate that the risk model has an excellent predictive performance for diagnosing the disease. Furthermore, our results show that this 5-target gene model is significantly associated with many drugs and extracellular matrix activities. Finally, the expression levels of both predictive signature genes EGR1 and PLA2G4A were validated in renal fibrosis and adjacent normal tissues by using qRT-PCR and Western blot method.

Indexed as

drug sensitivityimmune microenvironmentlogistic regressionprective modelrenal fibrosis

Identifiers

PMID36120336
PMCPMC9470879
OpenAlexW4293715303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.