ArticleCureus2022
An Incidental Malignant Gastrointestinal Neuroectodermal Tumor of the Stomach: A Rare Case Report and a Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A peculiar mimicker of gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Malignant Gastrointestinal Neuroectodermal Tumor - literature review and one case report.Archive of clinical cases · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumors (GNETs) are malignant tumors frequently arising within the muscularis propria of the gastrointestinal tract and often extend into the submucosa and subserosa. The stomach is the second most common site of incidence of GNETs after the small intestine. The most important differential of GNET is the clear cell sarcoma-gastrointestinal (CCS-GI). Both share similar morphological as well as molecular features and show S100 positivity; however, the lack of melanocytic differentiation in GNET distinguishes it from CCS-GI. Both typically show rearrangements of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.